Group 1 - The core argument of the article is that AI is not merely replacing jobs but is fundamentally undermining the theoretical foundations of the entire economic system [1][2] - The traditional GDP measurement is failing to reflect true human welfare and progress, as it is based on outdated metrics that do not account for the value created by AI and other non-monetary contributions [3][9] - The article highlights that the economic value of human labor is diminishing, with AI performing tasks more efficiently and at a lower cost, leading to a situation where human labor can be seen as a negative value [10][11][12] Group 2 - The pursuit of extreme efficiency in traditional economic systems has led to a lack of buffer, making the system vulnerable to risks, as illustrated by examples in global supply chains and agriculture [15][16][17] - The article discusses the collapse of four foundational assumptions of traditional economics in the AI era, including the scarcity of resources, the inherent value of human labor, the need for resource input for growth, and the monetary measurement of value [22][24][25][26][27][30] - The conclusion emphasizes the need for a new economic framework that values happiness, ecological balance, and the intangible aspects of life that cannot be quantified by money, suggesting that AI may help humanity rediscover what is truly valuable [32][35][37]