Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the behavior of JavaScript's `setTimeout` function, highlighting that it does not execute with a true delay of 0 milliseconds, but rather has a minimum delay of approximately 4 milliseconds due to browser limitations aimed at preventing abuse and ensuring user experience [6][8]. Group 1: Timer Behavior and Limitations - Browsers impose a minimum delay of 4 milliseconds for `setTimeout` to prevent excessive battery drain and maintain page interactivity [8]. - Different browsers have varying restrictions, with older versions of Edge increasing the delay to 16 milliseconds on battery-powered devices, and Chrome imposing a 1-second delay on background tabs [8]. - A benchmark test showed that `setTimeout` in Chrome took 4.2 milliseconds, while alternatives like `MessageChannel` and `scheduler.postTask` performed significantly better [10][11]. Group 2: Alternatives to setTimeout - The article evaluates alternatives to `setTimeout`, including `setImmediate`, `MessageChannel.postMessage`, `window.postMessage`, and `scheduler.postTask`, with the latter being recommended for its ease of use and performance [9][11]. - The benchmark results indicated that `scheduler.postTask` and `MessageChannel.postMessage` had comparable performance, while `setTimeout` was consistently slower across different browsers [10][11]. Group 3: Developer Responsibility and Browser Design - There is a debate within the industry regarding whether developers should be held accountable for their code or if browsers should impose restrictions to prevent misuse of APIs like `setTimeout` [12]. - The article suggests that providing developers with better tools for task scheduling could reduce reliance on `setTimeout` and the need for browser interventions [12][13]. - The existence of the Scheduler API indicates a shift towards empowering developers while aligning with browser rendering processes [13].