转自 | CSDN（ID：CSDNnews） TypeScript 7.0 核心升级：原生编译器登场，性能提升 10 倍 即将到来的 TypeScript 7.0，最重要的变化之一，是引入原生编译器 。 目前该版本已经进入预览 阶段。 Hejlsberg 表 示 ， 原 先 的 TypeScript 编 译 器 是 用 TypeScript 自 己 写 的 ， 并 运 行 在 V8 JavaScript 引擎之上。但随着项目规模和使用场景不断扩大，这种实现方式在性能上已经明显吃紧 ： "我们很快就发现，原生编译器能让性能提升 10 倍——其中一半收益来自原生代码本身，另一半 则源于对共享内存并发特性的充分利用。" 近日 ， T ypeScript 与 C# 的发明者、微 软技术研究员 Anders Hejlsberg 表示， 现有编程语言 之所以更适合 AI 编程 ，并不是因为它们更"先进"，而是因为它们拥有最大的训练数据集 。 而对于 AI，他给出了一个 直接的评价： 当前的大模型，本质上更像是一个"把别人做过的事情重新吐出来，在此基础上做一些简单推演"的 高级复读机。 这 番 表 态 来 自 他 与 Gi ...

Core Insights - C has regained the title of "Programming Language of the Year" in the 2025 TIOBE index, marking a significant rise in its ranking after three years [1] - The programming landscape is shifting, with C and C++ swapping positions, and C language maintaining its dominance in the embedded systems market [1] - Perl has made a remarkable leap from 32nd to 11th place, while R language has returned to the top ten, driven by growth in the data science sector [1] - Go language has fallen out of the top ten, and Ruby has dropped out of the top twenty, indicating a potential decline in their usage [1] Ranking Summary - Python remains the top programming language with a rating of 22.61%, although it has seen a slight decrease of 0.68% [2] - C has moved up to the second position with a rating of 10.99%, showing an increase of 2.13% [2] - Java and C++ have dropped to third and fourth positions, respectively, with Java at 8.71% (down 1.44%) and C++ at 8.67% (down 1.62%) [2] - C holds the fifth position with a rating of 7.39%, reflecting an increase of 2.94% [2] - Visual Basic and SQL are in sixth and eighth positions, respectively, with ratings of 2.41% and 2.27% [2] - R has climbed to the tenth position with a rating of 1.82%, up by 0.81% [2] - Perl's rise to 11th place with a rating of 1.63% marks a significant increase of 1.14% [2] - Rust has moved to 13th place with a rating of 1.51%, showing a modest increase of 0.34% [2] - Go has dropped to 16th place with a rating of 1.24%, down by 1.37% [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the development of MoonBit, an AI-native programming language designed to address the challenges posed by AI in software development, emphasizing its unique features and the vision behind its creation [6][12][40]. Group 1: Development and Features of MoonBit - MoonBit is distinct from existing AI coding tools like Cursor and Copilot, as it aims to create a foundational programming language rather than just a tool for code generation [6][12]. - The development of MoonBit is driven by the emergence of large models like ChatGPT, which have made it feasible to create a new programming language that can scale rapidly [6][12]. - Key characteristics of MoonBit include reliability, simplicity, efficiency, and strong control over the entire toolchain, which are essential for adapting to the AI era [7][12][14]. Group 2: Market Position and Community Engagement - MoonBit has gained significant traction, with user numbers growing from approximately 26,000 in November 2022 to over 100,000 within a year, despite not having released its 1.0 version yet [20][21]. - The community around MoonBit has accumulated nearly 3,000 libraries, which is notable for a programming language that is only three years old [9][25]. - The user base primarily consists of students in China and developers interested in WebAssembly globally, indicating a strategic focus on high-value markets [22][39]. Group 3: Ownership and Ecosystem Strategy - Unlike traditional programming languages that are open-source and community-driven, MoonBit operates on a model of ownership, where high-quality code generated on the platform retains its value exclusively within the MoonBit ecosystem [10][29]. - This ownership model is designed to create a sustainable ecosystem that can support long-term growth and commercial viability, contrasting with the open-source approach that often leads to a lack of funding for development [10][36]. - The company aims to build a robust platform that not only provides a programming language but also a comprehensive toolchain, ensuring that all components work seamlessly together [15][46]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Challenges - The company anticipates that the AI-driven software engineering revolution will deepen over the next 3-5 years, creating a significant market opportunity for AI-native programming languages and tools [17][40]. - The primary challenge for MoonBit will be to maintain patience and focus on long-term goals, as the development of a new programming language typically requires substantial time and effort [48][49]. - The vision includes positioning MoonBit as a leading platform in the software development landscape, with aspirations to deliver a significant portion of global software through its ecosystem by 2026-2027 [40][46].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding DOM manipulation and event handling for Java developers transitioning to front-end development, highlighting that front-end is not chaotic but can be approached systematically [2][3]. Group 1: Understanding DOM - DOM is not just a string but a programmable tree structure where each HTML element is an object with properties and methods [2][3]. - The key mindset shift is to view the page as a real-time modifiable data structure rather than a static output [3]. Group 2: Event Handling - Front-end event handling is similar to Java's listener pattern but involves more diverse event sources, including user inputs and interactions [5][6]. - Events have inherent asynchronicity and uncertainty, requiring callback functions for responses [5]. - Event propagation includes capturing and bubbling phases, allowing for efficient event delegation [6][7]. Group 3: Practical Techniques - Ensure DOM is ready before manipulation, as browsers parse HTML while downloading [8][9]. - Avoid duplicate event bindings to prevent multiple triggers of callbacks [10][11]. - Organize interaction logic semantically to maintain code clarity, similar to Java's layered architecture [12]. Group 4: Advantages and Pitfalls - Java developers possess advantages in understanding object-oriented and modular concepts, aiding in component-based development [15]. - Common pitfalls include treating asynchronous events with synchronous thinking and over-relying on global variables, leading to state confusion [15].

Core Viewpoint - The TIOBE index for December 2025 shows that the R programming language has re-entered the top ten, indicating a growing demand for deep data analysis and visualization in enterprises [1][3]. Group 1: R Language Insights - R language is a specialized tool designed for statistical analysis and data visualization, maintaining its stronghold in academia and research-intensive industries [1][5]. - Unlike general-purpose programming languages, R focuses on statistical modeling and data processing, excelling in its niche [4]. - The competition between R and Python has ended, with Python dominating the general programming landscape [6][8]. - R plays a core role in academic and research settings, while industries prefer Python for its unified technology stack [11]. Group 2: TIOBE Index Rankings - The top ten programming languages in December 2025 are Python, C, C++, Java, C, JavaScript, Visual Basic, SQL, Perl, and R [19]. - C is noted as the fastest-growing language, evolving from a Windows-only enterprise language to a modern, cross-platform, open-source representative [15]. - C and Java are now nearly equal in game development, web services, and cloud-native applications [17]. - The historical ranking of programming languages from 1985 to 2025 shows significant shifts, with Python rising to the top position [25].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significance and impact of JavaScript in the current technology landscape, highlighting its widespread use and versatility in web development [5]. Group 1 - JavaScript is a dominant programming language, essential for creating interactive web applications and enhancing user experience [5]. - The language has evolved significantly, with frameworks and libraries like React and Angular contributing to its popularity and functionality [5]. - The article emphasizes the importance of JavaScript in the context of modern web technologies, indicating that it is a critical skill for developers [5].

Core Insights - The TIOBE Index for November 2025 indicates that C may surpass Java for the first time in history, following Python's dominance since late 2023 [1][12] - C is currently the fastest-growing programming language, with a significant upward trend that could lead to it becoming the top language in 2025 [4][12] - The competition between C and Java has intensified, with the gap between their ratings now being less than 1% [12][19] Programming Language Rankings - The current top programming languages are Python, C, C++, Java, and C, with C showing a notable increase of 2.67% [12][21] - The historical ranking of programming languages shows C maintaining its position at fifth place, while Python remains at the top [28][29] - The rankings reflect the shifting focus of developers towards languages that offer modern features and cross-platform capabilities [19][30] Industry Trends - C has evolved from being a Windows-only enterprise language to a modern, cross-platform, and open-source language, making it competitive with Java in various fields [13][19] - Java continues to dominate in the financial sector due to legacy systems, but C is gaining ground in game development, web services, and cloud-native applications [7][9][19] - The programming landscape is characterized by a shift in developer preferences towards languages that enhance productivity and user experience rather than just stability [15][19]

Core Insights - The core insight of the article is that TypeScript has overtaken Python as the most widely used programming language on GitHub, marking a significant shift in developer preferences towards typed languages, particularly in the context of AI-assisted development [2][4][6]. Group 1: Language Popularity and Growth - TypeScript became the most popular language on GitHub in August 2025, surpassing Python with approximately 2.6 million contributors, a year-over-year growth of 66.6% [6][13]. - Python, while dropping to second place, still maintains a strong presence with around 2.6 million contributors, growing by 48.8% year-over-year [6][20]. - JavaScript remains a significant player with 2.15 million contributors, but its growth has slowed as developers shift towards TypeScript [7][9]. Group 2: Factors Driving TypeScript's Rise - The rise of TypeScript is attributed to its type system, which reduces code ambiguity and helps catch errors generated by AI before deployment [14][15]. - Many modern development frameworks now default to TypeScript, further driving its adoption among developers [14]. - The entry barrier for TypeScript is lower due to tools that simplify setup, making it accessible for junior developers [16] . Group 3: Python's Continued Dominance in AI - Despite TypeScript's rise, Python remains the dominant language in AI projects, driving nearly half of the new AI repositories with 582,196 new projects, a year-over-year growth of 50.7% [20]. - Jupyter Notebook continues to be the preferred exploratory environment for AI, with 402,643 repositories, reflecting a 17.8% increase [20][18]. Group 4: Broader Trends in Development - Open-source development activity reached record levels, with a total of 1.12 billion contributions, a 13% year-over-year increase [24]. - India emerged as the largest source of new developers on GitHub in 2025, contributing over 5.2 million new developers, which is more than 14% of the total new developers [26]. - The growth of traditional languages like Java and C continues, indicating their stability in enterprise environments despite the rise of AI [27]. Group 5: Emerging Languages and Tools - Luau, the scripting language for Roblox, saw a remarkable growth of over 194%, reflecting a trend towards typed flexibility in the industry [31]. - The focus on performance-centric developer tools is increasing, with tools like Ghostty and Tailwind CSS gaining attention for their speed and minimal development friction [32].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the growing importance of programming as a skill for children, highlighting the need to choose the right programming language for their learning journey [2][15] - The "Children's Programming Language Development Trend List" serves as a significant reference for understanding industry trends and educational philosophies [2][3] Trend Analysis - The ranking reveals a shift from traditional programming languages like C++, Java, and Python to languages that align more closely with children's cognitive development and interests [3] - The top-ranked platform, Xigua Creator, exemplifies a successful educational approach by integrating a systematic learning path from graphical programming (Scratch) to text-based programming (Python) [3][4] Language Distribution - The list categorizes programming languages into two main tiers: graphical programming languages (e.g., Scratch, Blockly) and text-based programming languages (e.g., Python) [4] - Scratch is recognized as the standard for children's programming initiation, allowing for creative expression without the burden of complex syntax [6] Educational Pathways - The transition from graphical to text-based programming is crucial for children's development, with Python being the recommended next step due to its simplicity and wide application in fields like AI and data science [7][10] - The article outlines a structured approach to learning, emphasizing the importance of engaging and enjoyable educational experiences [8][15] Future Considerations - The choice of programming language is framed as an investment in children's future, with different languages leading to various career paths [9][10] - A comprehensive learning platform is deemed essential, providing exposure to multiple programming paradigms and fostering a supportive learning environment [11][12] Age-Specific Recommendations - For ages 6-9, graphical programming like Scratch is recommended to build foundational logic and computational thinking [16] - Ages 9-12 is identified as the optimal time to transition to Python, while ages 12 and above can focus on languages aligned with their interests, such as C++ for game development or JavaScript for web development [16]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities and challenges faced by both front-end and back-end developers, emphasizing that each role has its own difficulties and intricacies that are often overlooked by those outside the field [2][12]. Front-end Development - Front-end development involves a wide range of technologies and frameworks such as React, Vue, Angular, and Svelte, which require continuous learning and adaptation due to rapid changes in the market [7]. - Tools like Webpack and Vite are essential for building applications, but they can be complex to configure and troubleshoot [7]. - The use of TypeScript adds a layer of complexity to JavaScript, but it can help prevent errors in the long run [7]. - CSS layout techniques like Flex and Grid, along with responsive design and animations, require attention to detail to ensure a good user experience [7][11]. - Front-end developers must ensure that applications are visually appealing and user-friendly, which involves meticulous attention to detail in design and functionality [11]. Back-end Development - Back-end development is often perceived as less complex because it lacks a visible interface, but it involves critical tasks such as managing data integrity, server performance, and application logic [11]. - Back-end developers must handle high concurrency, database design, and system architecture, which are essential for maintaining application stability and performance [11][12]. - The responsibilities include designing database structures, implementing caching strategies, and ensuring the system can handle peak loads without failure [11]. Comparison of Roles - The article highlights that perceptions of complexity in development roles are subjective and depend on one's position within the development process [9]. - Both front-end and back-end developers face unique challenges, and the article argues that neither role is inherently easier than the other [12]. - The visibility of front-end work makes it easier for outsiders to critique, while back-end work often goes unnoticed despite its importance [12].