（来源：千龙网） 伊朗与美国的第三轮间接谈判26日在位于瑞士日内瓦的"阿曼驻日内瓦外交代表机构"举行。关于此次伊朗美国间接谈判，伊朗方面的考量是什么？伊美关系 又会如何发展？ 伊美谈判检验外交意愿 战争风险代价高昂 总台记者 李健南：本轮谈判伊方仍然聚焦核问题和解除制裁议题。针对伊美关系和地区局势的前景，伊朗官方伊通社在一篇评论文章中指出，本轮谈判最 重要的意义之一，在于检验各方是否更倾向于外交接触而非军事对抗。评论总结了两种设想：第一个设想是，在国际原子能机构的参与下，如果双方都基于 理性和从地区各国利益角度出发，达成协议的可能性并非遥不可及。现实情况是，如果各方在战争一触即发的紧张局势下，展现必要意愿，就核问题展开对 话，达成基本框架，则各方可以期待当下危机得到缓和。但鉴于美国总统特朗普在此前若干年内针对伊朗实施的一系列不合理行动，这一期望在当前显得过 于乐观。第二个设想是爆发军事冲突。评论认为，如果启动军事选项，特朗普必须考量以下几个问题：对伊朗发动攻击的借口是什么？战争会给美国自身、 美国的地区盟友以及世界带来什么后果？战争将如何结束？分析指出，回答这些问题并非易事，从成本效益分析表明，美国袭击伊朗的 ...

新华社德黑兰2月26日电（记者沙达提 陈霄）据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社26日报道，伊朗国防委员会秘书阿 里·沙姆哈尼表示，如果伊美第三轮间接谈判核心问题是确保伊朗不寻求发展核武器，谈判双方则有望 迅速达成协议。 责编：黄之安、侯兴川 伊朗与美国的第三轮间接谈判26日在瑞士日内瓦举行。此次谈判由阿曼斡旋，在阿曼驻日内瓦外交代表 机构举行。据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社报道，由于双方代表团要求各自进行商议，谈判暂停，并将于当天晚些 时候继续进行。 另据卡塔尔半岛电视台报道，国际原子能机构总干事格罗西已加入谈判，并担任技术观察员。 沙姆哈尼表示，如果伊美谈判的核心是伊方已公开承诺的不发展核武器，那么双方迅速达成协议是可行 的。他强调，这一条件符合伊朗已公开的军事理论和领导层的指示。 ...

来源：央视新闻客户端 当地时间2月23日，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃在记者会上表示，关于伊美谈判将如何进行以及相关议题，外界有很多猜测，这并不奇怪。 伊朗不证实 任何猜测，每次谈判的细节都在谈判桌上讨论，关于所谓与美国可能达成 " 临时协议 " 的猜测毫无根据。 巴加埃指出，任何旨在强迫一方单方面接受另一方要求的谈判都不会取得成果，对伊朗而言更是如此。伊朗相信其在核领域和解除制裁领域提出的 观点具有合理性，只要能取得成果，伊朗将继续推进这一进程。 针对稍早前阿曼方面消息人士称，伊朗最高国家安全委员会秘书拉里贾尼将于24日前往阿曼递交伊朗提出的方案，巴加埃表示，其不知晓此事，需 要进一步核实该消息。（总台记者 李健南） ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Israel has become the biggest uncertainty in the negotiations between Iran and the United States, actively seeking to disrupt the talks [1] - The second round of indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran took place in Geneva, with both sides acknowledging progress despite ongoing differences, and agreeing to continue discussions [1][3] - Israel has expressed skepticism about the U.S.-Iran negotiations, with Prime Minister Netanyahu stating that any future agreement should address not only Iran's nuclear issues but also its ballistic missile program and regional militias [3] Group 2 - Reports indicate that Israel has raised its national alert level and some institutions have been asked to prepare for potential military action against Iran, suggesting a possible joint attack with the U.S. [3] - Iranian experts believe that Israel is attempting to undermine the negotiations through unpredictable actions, including military maneuvers and media narratives suggesting an imminent U.S. attack on Iran [5] - The current regional dynamics show Israel taking a more aggressive role, aiming to prevent Iran from gaining influence and military strength in the Middle East, with a focus on military rather than diplomatic solutions [7]

Core Viewpoint - The recent round of indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States has shown clearer prospects for reaching an agreement, although differences in positions still exist and further communication is needed [1] Group 1: Negotiation Progress - The second round of indirect negotiations took place in Geneva, where both parties engaged in serious and constructive discussions [1] - Positive progress was reported compared to the previous round, with a general consensus on a series of guiding principles reached [1] - The next steps will involve drafting potential agreement texts, although this does not guarantee a swift resolution [1] Group 2: Future Steps - Both parties will work on the potential agreement text and exchange opinions before scheduling a third round of negotiations [1] - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Grossi, arrived in Geneva to discuss technical issues with the Iranian side [1]

Core Points - The second round of negotiations between Iran and the U.S. was described as more serious and in-depth compared to the previous round [1] - The atmosphere during the talks was reported to be more constructive, with various ideas being presented [1] - A general consensus on a series of guiding principles was reached, which will serve as the basis for drafting a potential agreement [1] - The process of drafting the text is expected to be challenging, but positive progress has been made [1] - The specific timing for the next round of negotiations has not yet been determined, as both sides will first review the content of the text [1] - There is a clearer understanding of the actions needed moving forward, although differences in positions remain and will require time to bridge [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the ongoing indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States, with some overall agreements reached in the second round of talks, while details are still under discussion [1][2][3] - The second round of indirect negotiations took place in Geneva, Switzerland, at the Omani diplomatic mission, indicating a neutral ground for discussions [3] - The initial indirect talks occurred on the 6th of this month in Muscat, Oman, where both parties agreed to continue negotiations despite significant disagreements on core issues [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's diplomatic efforts with regional countries aim to strengthen political options and ease regional tensions, highlighting the need for a special coordination mechanism to address the increasingly complex security situation [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Efforts - Iran's diplomatic initiatives are focused on enhancing political options and mitigating regional tensions, which are becoming more complex [1] - The establishment of a special coordination mechanism is deemed necessary to avoid actions that could destabilize the region [1] Group 2: Negotiations with the U.S. - If U.S.-Iran negotiations are pragmatic and the U.S. does not impose excessive demands, the talks could progress positively and align with the interests of all parties involved [1] Group 3: Military Stance - Iran's missile program is considered a "red line" and is non-negotiable, with the military on high alert for any miscalculations that could lead to severe consequences [1] - Iran asserts that Israel cannot act without direct support from the U.S., and any aggressive actions against Iran will be met with a strong and decisive response [1]

Group 1 - Iran commemorated the 47th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution with large-scale demonstrations in Tehran and other cities, emphasizing national pride and resilience [1] - Iranian President Pezeshkian stated that Iran does not seek nuclear weapons and is open to any form of nuclear inspections, but dialogue is hindered by significant distrust from the US and Europe [1] Group 2 - Iran's Chief National Security Council Secretary, Larijani, visited Oman to discuss negotiations with the US, indicating a positive stance from Iran and potential opportunities for strategic de-escalation [2] - Concurrently, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu visited the US to discuss issues related to Iran, highlighting ongoing geopolitical tensions [2] - US President Trump is considering deploying a second aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East in preparation for potential military action if negotiations with Iran fail, with the USS Lincoln already stationed in the region [2]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between Oman's Sultan Haitham and Iran's Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Larijani, focused on the latest developments in negotiations between Iran and the United States, emphasizing the need for a balanced and fair agreement [1] Group 1 - Sultan Haitham and Larijani discussed the importance of returning to dialogue and the negotiation table to promote mutual understanding [1] - The discussions aimed to address differences through peaceful means, contributing to regional and global peace and security [1]