Group 1 - The article discusses the transformation of the media landscape, highlighting the rise of short video platforms and the decline of traditional media [6][18][20] - It emphasizes that short videos have a low entry barrier, allowing anyone with a smartphone to become a content creator, which contrasts with the traditional media era where opportunities were limited to professionals [7][8][18] - The shift in content creation has led to a diverse range of voices and perspectives, as ordinary individuals gain visibility and influence through platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou [8][24] Group 2 - The article notes that the monetization strategies have evolved, with traditional media relying on subscriptions and advertisements, while short video creators utilize live streaming and direct sales [11][16] - It highlights the effectiveness of the "short direct dual opening" model in short videos, which links advertising directly to sales, significantly increasing gross merchandise value (GMV) [14][16] - The author argues that the traditional media's focus on depth and quality is at risk if it continues to chase quick and superficial content [22][26] Group 3 - The article raises concerns about the loss of value-driven narratives in the short video era, suggesting that the algorithm-driven nature of these platforms may amplify negative societal values [24][25] - It posits that while short videos dominate the surface-level content, there remains a critical need for in-depth analysis and thoughtful journalism, akin to mining deeper resources [26][27] - The conclusion emphasizes that both short video content and traditional writing have their respective roles, with the latter being essential for deeper societal understanding [26][27]