Core Viewpoint - An increasing number of automotive companies have committed to a payment term of no more than 60 days for suppliers, responding to regulatory changes aimed at alleviating cash flow pressures in the supply chain [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Commitments - As of now, 15 automotive companies, including GAC Group, China FAW, Dongfeng Motor, NIO, Li Auto, Xiaomi Auto, Geely, BYD, Chery, Changan, Seres, BAIC, SAIC, Leap Motor, and Jianghuai Automobile, have pledged to keep payment terms within 60 days [1]. - SAIC and BAIC have not only committed to the 60-day payment term but also stated they will not use commercial acceptance bills, which can increase financial pressure on suppliers [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - The 60-day payment term aligns with the revised "Regulations on the Payment of Funds to Small and Medium-sized Enterprises" issued by the State Council, which took effect on June 1, requiring large enterprises to pay small and medium-sized enterprises within 60 days of delivery [1][2]. - The regulations also prohibit forcing small and medium-sized enterprises to accept non-cash payment methods, such as commercial bills, to prevent the extension of payment cycles [1]. Group 3: Current Payment Practices - Historically, payment terms for suppliers in the joint venture era did not exceed three months, but current practices have extended average payment terms to over 170 days, with some exceeding 240 days [3]. - Some Tier 1 suppliers report payment terms extending beyond eight months, and upstream suppliers often face even longer terms, exacerbating financial strain on smaller suppliers [3]. Group 4: Challenges with Commercial Bills - Commercial bills, which can have a redemption period of 3-6 months, force suppliers to choose between longer payment terms and accepting discounted payments [4][5]. - The discount rates for commercial bills can be significantly high, with some reaching up to 11% for six-month periods, further impacting suppliers' cash flow [4]. Group 5: Ambiguities in Payment Terms - Despite commitments to a 60-day payment term, there are ambiguities regarding when this term begins, as it can vary based on delivery, acceptance, and invoicing processes [6][7]. - Suppliers have expressed skepticism about the sincerity of these commitments, viewing them as potentially empty promises, given the historical context of payment practices in the industry [7].

6 月 1 日， 国务院最新修订的《保障中小企业款项支付条例》 正式 施行。文件规定，机关、事业单位、大型企业应当自货物、工程、服务 交付之日起 60 日内支付款项。 这一消息引发车圈集体发声响应。 自 6 月 10 日起，广汽集团、中国一汽、东风汽车、赛力斯集团、比亚迪、长城汽车、小米汽车、小鹏汽 车等 十余家 车企纷纷宣布， 将给供应商的支付账期控制在 60 天以内 ， 以保障供应链资金高效周转，助力产业链良好协同发展。 若这一举措最终能落地，一方面供应链企业 "苦账期久矣"的情况将好转，缓解内卷式竞争。但另一方面，对于现金流欠佳的车企也会是重大 考验。 01 十多家车企相继表态 从时间线上来看， 6 月 10 日晚间，广汽集团、中国一汽、东风汽车、赛力斯等车企率先承诺将供应商账期缩短至 60 天以内。 随后至 6 月 11 日上午，比亚迪、吉利汽车、长安汽车、奇瑞汽车、小鹏汽车、长城汽车、小米汽车、北汽集团、零跑汽车、理想汽车、上 汽集团、蔚来、江汽等车企迅速跟进，共同拉开了中国汽车产业账期革命的序幕。截至发稿，响应该政策的车企数量仍在不断增加。 供应商账期被认为是汽车行业内卷竞争造成的恶劣结果之一，曾 ...