Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights that convertible bond funds have emerged as the best-performing category within bond funds, with significant returns leading the market [1][15] - As of 2025, the total scale of the public fund industry is approaching 36 trillion, indicating a robust growth trend [1][15] - The top-performing fund, Southern Changyuan Convertible Bond A, achieved an impressive annual return of 48.77%, significantly outperforming its peers [2][16] Group 2 - The top three funds in the bond category are Southern Changyuan Convertible Bond A (48.77%), Minsheng Jia Yin Enhanced Income A (35.89%), and Bosera Convertible Bond Enhanced A (35.24%), showcasing a clear performance gap among them [2][19] - The market is witnessing a trend where funds are concentrating towards leading products and star managers, with Penghua Convertible Bond A being the only fund exceeding 9.297 billion in scale [2][16] - Notably, some high-performing funds have relatively small scales, such as Dongfang Convertible Bond A and Baoying Rongyuan Convertible Bond A, both around 0.1 billion, indicating potential for growth [2][16] Group 3 - Fund managers are increasingly adopting a model of managing multiple funds or collaborating in teams, with notable performances from managers like Liu Wenliang of Southern Fund [3][17] - The long-term performance of convertible bond funds remains strong, with Southern Changyuan Convertible Bond A leading with a three-year return of 44.50% [8][22] - The long-term performance rankings show a more diverse strategy composition compared to short-term rankings, with funds like Guangda Zhonggaodeng A and Huashan Strengthened Income A also achieving competitive returns [9][23] Group 4 - The "blacklist" of underperforming bond funds reveals that the bottom ten funds have experienced losses exceeding 4%, with some being pure bond products facing significant net value pressure [10][24] - The worst-performing fund, Huitianfu Fenghe Pure Bond A, recorded a return of -7.70%, indicating challenges in the current interest rate environment [10][24] - Several funds have shrunk to "mini-fund" status, raising concerns about their operational viability and potential liquidity risks [12][27]