债基为何也"玩心跳"？ 债券基金稳健的形象正在面临考验。 12月以来，债市再度遭遇逆风，10年期国债收益率冲高1.8723%，叠加地产信用风波与各种市场传闻，多只债基净值"跳水"。华宸未来稳健添利A近一月暴 跌7.72%，年内收益一朝清零，更将净值砸回两年前水平；作为纯债产品的汇添富丰和纯债A，年内跌幅累计超过7%，投资者直呼"跌出了股基的感觉"。 伴随净值下跌，赎回压力同步显现。作为三季度"失血王"的债基再度遭遇大额赎回，四季度近60只产品因大额赎回紧急提高净值精度。不过，第一财经从部 分机构人士处了解到，近期纯债产品赎回情况已渐趋平稳，叠加年末持续营销等因素，债基整体规模仍保持净流入。此外，"固收+"产品成为这一阶段的重 点营销项目。 那么，此轮调整原因为何？长城基金固定收益研究部副总经理吴冰燕告诉第一财经记者，本轮市场调整并非由基本面或资金面的实质性变化所主导，更多是 市场情绪波动叠加机构行为调整引发的阶段性波动。 展望后续，吴冰燕提示，市场接下来核心关注点集中在会议释放的政策增量信息，包括明年宏观政策基调、货币与财政政策协同方向、稳增长与防风险的平 衡措施等。"这些信息将直接影响机构对后续市场走势的判 ...

Core Viewpoint - Huatai Fuhua Fund, once known for its "stable investment" approach, is currently facing significant challenges as its bond funds have underperformed, leading to a loss of investor confidence [3][9]. Group 1: Fund Performance - Huatai Fuhua's bond fund, Huatai Fuhua Pure Bond A, has experienced a drawdown of over 7% in the last three months and a loss of 5.4% in the last six months, ranking it among the bottom in the market [5][10]. - The fund's performance has shattered the perception that "pure bond funds equal stability," placing Huatai Fuhua under scrutiny as a leading fixed-income fund company [9][10]. - The overall bond market has seen a shift in investment logic, leading to a "double kill" scenario for both stocks and bonds, with Huatai Fuhua's fund being particularly affected [12][17]. Group 2: Market Conditions - A fundamental shift in macro policy expectations has occurred, with strong stimulus signals leading to increased inflation expectations and potential upward pressure on interest rates, negatively impacting the bond market [13][16]. - The "see-saw" effect between stocks and bonds has become evident, with capital flowing from the bond market to the equity market due to lower deposit rates and a strong stock market performance [16][17]. Group 3: Management Issues - The significant losses in Huatai Fuhua Pure Bond A are attributed not only to market conditions but also to internal management decisions, including a sudden change in fund management during a turbulent market period [19][20]. - The previous fund manager, He Min, had a solid track record, while the new manager, Peng Weinan, lacks sufficient experience in managing long-term pure bond funds, leading to a mismatch in capability and asset complexity [23][25]. - The departure of experienced managers has created a talent gap within the firm, exacerbating the challenges faced by the fixed-income team [30][31]. Group 4: Governance and Trust Issues - The issues faced by Huatai Fuhua are indicative of deeper governance flaws and a crisis of trust within the company, as evidenced by a significant drop in the scale of new fund issuances from 200 billion in 2020 to 25.9 billion in 2024 [26][27]. - The internal pressure on research and investment talent has led to a situation where fund managers are overextended, making it difficult to conduct thorough due diligence on each bond [28][30]. - The lack of effective risk control and communication with investors has further intensified the trust crisis, as the fund's significant drawdown went unaddressed by the internal risk management system [32].