Core Viewpoint - The recently released official version of the "Regulations on the Management of Sales Fees for Publicly Raised Securities Investment Funds" has sparked significant discussion in the industry, with notable optimizations compared to the draft version, indicating a policy direction of "precise relaxation and pressure relief" [1][2] Summary by Relevant Sections Changes in Redemption Fee Structure - The official version allows for different redemption fee agreements for individual investors holding for 7 days or more and institutional investors holding for 30 days or more, contrasting with the draft which imposed uniform fees [2][3] - The redemption fee for bond funds has been significantly relaxed, reducing the previously anticipated redemption pressure on bond markets [3] Transition Period and Market Impact - The adjustment period has been extended to 12 months, providing more time for institutional investors and public funds to adapt, thereby alleviating the concentrated redemption pressure faced by bond funds [3][4] - Following the new regulations, the interbank bond market saw a decline in yield rates, indicating a positive market sentiment [3] Short-term, Medium-term, and Long-term Effects - In the short term, the policy relaxation is expected to repair market sentiment, with potential trading opportunities emerging in the bond market [4][5] - Medium-term structural adjustments in the bond market are anticipated, with a shift towards bond ETFs expected to attract institutional funds [5][6] - Long-term, the new regulations aim to foster a healthy market ecosystem focused on long-term investments, potentially saving investors approximately 51 billion annually in fees [6][8] Investment Strategies and Market Outlook - Despite the positive developments, the overall bond market is expected to remain in a volatile state, with a focus on structural opportunities rather than trend-based movements [7][8] - Recommendations include targeting short-term products and high-grade credit bonds, while being cautious with long-term interest rate bonds due to ongoing supply-demand imbalances [7][8]