年近八旬老人称亡妻存折中60万元存款未取出，将开户银行告上法院？近日，裁判文书网披 露了一则储蓄存款合同纠纷案。 此外，该存折记载的存入100万元的记录与朝阳支行系统及账目中记载的内容也不一致。朝 阳支行称该行在一审中已充分举证，案涉存折不存在现存100万元及支取40万元记录，"以经 过手工修改的交易记录要求银行取款显然没有依据"。 该案中，崔某某自称在妻子的遗物中找到一张存折，曾存储100万元并取出40万元，因此提 起诉讼要求开户银行给付存款本金60万元及利息。 然而，涉案存折却"疑点重重"。该存折于2000年6月7日开户并存入1元，第二行打印内容却 显示于2000年6月6日存入100万元，6日还被手写涂改为7日。此外，开户银行提供的交易流 水中也不存在100万元存款与40万元取款的记录。 经法院询问，崔某某既没有对存折上的问题作出合理解释，也没有提供证据证明其资金来 源。一审法院判决驳回崔某某的诉讼请求，崔某某不服判决继续上诉。 二审法院认定，该存折上所记载的"存入100万元后取款40万元，剩余60万存款"真伪不明， 不足以被认定尚有60万元存款。2025年8月28日，二审法院作出判决：驳回上诉，维持原 ...

Group 1 - The company, Nanjing Koyuan Smart Technology Group Co., Ltd., is involved in a legal dispute with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Nantong Branch regarding a savings deposit contract, with the first-instance judgment made on December 31, 2024, and the appeal rejected on May 17, 2025 [1][2] - As of July 21, 2025, the company received a total of RMB 210 million from the court, but there remains an outstanding amount of RMB 85 million in principal and interest that has not yet been recovered [2] - The company has initiated a lawsuit for the remaining RMB 85 million, which is expected to have a high likelihood of recovery due to the legal relationship being consistent with the previously adjudicated case [2][3] Group 2 - The company does not have any other significant undisclosed litigation or arbitration matters as of the announcement date [3] - The ongoing litigation is anticipated to have a positive impact on the company's financial status for the current year, pending final accounting confirmation [3] - The company will continue to monitor the execution of the court's judgment and will actively respond to any related legal proceedings [3]