1月6日，美国总统特朗普宣布，委内瑞拉临时政府将向美国移交3000万至5000万桶石油。这些石油将按 市场价出售，所得资金将由美方监管。 按国际油价每桶约56美元计算，这笔石油资产的价值或高达28亿美元。 合法性争议尚未平息，反对声浪已在美国社会内部蔓延。 从华盛顿到洛杉矶，全美已有100多个城市爆发示威，抗议对委军事行动。 当石油被摆上桌面，美国对委内瑞拉采取军事打击的真实目的，难以用"安全"或"民主"加以包装。 美方高层的表态甚至也不再回避这一点。 美国副总统万斯称，此举将让美国对全球能源资源拥有"更多控制权"。共和党参议员格雷厄姆则表示， 美国正在"掌控委内瑞拉"，并将通过选举实现政权更迭，"新领导人将与美国做生意。" 然而，与华盛顿霸权野心形成鲜明对比的，是这套行动在法律层面的基础缺失。 "美国此举不但没有任何国际法的依据，也违背了部分国内法律。"中国社科院美国问题专家吕祥接受三 里河采访时表示，去年年底，美政府将委内瑞拉政府列为"外国恐怖组织"，并据此封锁受制裁油轮，但 按照美国法律，"外国恐怖组织"针对的是非国家行为体，且这一认定并未经过调查程序。 美国国内也出现质疑声音。新泽西州联邦参议员安迪· ...

Core Insights - The meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska reflects a significant focus on the evolving dynamics of US-China-Russia relations, with Trump expressing concerns about the strengthening ties between China and Russia [1][15] - Trump's comments during the interview indicate a strategic shift in his approach towards China, suggesting that his previous threats regarding tariffs were more about leveraging negotiations with Putin than genuine intent to impose sanctions [3][11] Group 1: Meeting Context and Dynamics - The meeting took place on August 15, 2025, at the Elmendorf-Richardson Joint Military Base in Alaska, symbolizing a historical transaction between Russia and the US [3][5] - Trump's announcement of the meeting was quickly confirmed by the Kremlin, indicating a high level of diplomatic engagement [3] - The meeting was initially scheduled for six hours but concluded in less than three hours without any agreements being signed, highlighting the urgency and possibly contentious nature of the discussions [7] Group 2: US-China-Russia Relations - Trump emphasized the similarities between Putin's strength and China's position, indicating a growing concern over the strategic partnership between China and Russia [9][12] - The bilateral trade between China and Russia exceeded $240 billion in 2024, with China accounting for 19.6% of Russia's oil exports, showcasing the deep economic ties that complicate US strategies [12] - Putin's communication with China prior to the meeting reinforced the notion that regardless of the outcomes, the strategic partnership between China and Russia remains steadfast [14] Group 3: Strategic Proposals and Reactions - Trump proposed that Ukraine recognize Russia's sovereignty over Crimea and suggested that Russia should contribute $200-500 billion for Ukraine's reconstruction, a proposal that did not receive a positive response from Russia [12] - The proposal raised concerns in Europe, with Poland mobilizing troops towards the Ukrainian border, indicating the potential geopolitical ramifications of the discussions [12] - Trump's approach appears to mimic a "reverse Nixon" strategy, attempting to leverage Russia against China, but the reality of the strong China-Russia partnership presents significant challenges to this strategy [12][15]