Core Viewpoint - The installation of "smoking transparent" toilet doors in a Shenzhen shopping mall has sparked widespread debate, highlighting the challenges of smoking control in public restrooms, which are both public spaces and private areas [1] Group 1: Technology and Governance - The "smoking transparent" design represents an attempt to replace administrative enforcement with moral deterrence, creating psychological pressure through potential exposure [2] - This approach risks institutionalizing shame and could lead to online harassment, as the technology may not distinguish between different types of smoke, leading to privacy violations [2] - The reliance on technology for governance may obscure the lack of accountability and responsibility in management, as it substitutes for ongoing human effort and institutional design [2] Group 2: Alternative Solutions - Public space managers should avoid relying on "automatic transparency" as a one-size-fits-all solution for smoking control, advocating for more systematic and humane approaches [3] - Utilizing smoke detection technology to trigger sound alarms or notify cleaning and security personnel could effectively address violations while respecting privacy [3] - A mature society should balance public interest with individual dignity, ensuring that governance methods do not compromise personal respect and privacy [3]

Core Viewpoint - A unique door design in a restroom in Shenzhen has sparked discussions online, featuring a mechanism that makes the glass door transparent when smoke is detected, aimed at controlling smoking in public restrooms [1][3] Group 1: Door Design and Functionality - The restroom in question has five stalls, with two featuring the smoke-detecting transparent doors [1] - The doors operate using a smoke detector that triggers an electric current to change the glass from frosted to transparent, allowing management to monitor smoking activities [3] - These doors have been in use for three to four months and are primarily installed in high-traffic areas [3] Group 2: Legal and Privacy Concerns - Legal experts note that while public venues have the right to manage smoking, the use of such technology in restrooms raises privacy issues, as these spaces are considered private [3] - The potential for malfunctioning equipment to inadvertently trigger the transparency feature could lead to privacy violations, increasing the risk of legal challenges [3]

Core Viewpoint - The enforcement of smoking bans in public places is inconsistent, leading to health risks from secondhand smoke and increased fire hazards [1][2][3] Group 1: Public Health Concerns - Many readers express concerns about smoking in public places, highlighting the dangers of secondhand smoke to non-smokers [1] - Smoking in venues with flammable materials poses significant fire risks, as illustrated by an incident at a wedding where smoking occurred in a carpeted hall with obstructed fire safety systems [2] Group 2: Regulatory Framework - Although there is no national smoking ban, various local regulations exist that prohibit smoking in indoor public spaces, with penalties for violations [2][3] - Specific fines are outlined in local laws, such as Wuhan's regulations, which impose fines on individuals and venue operators for non-compliance [2] Group 3: Enforcement Challenges - The execution of smoking bans is hindered by a lack of clarity regarding enforcement responsibilities among different regulatory bodies [3] - Some public venue operators adopt a lenient approach towards smoking to avoid alienating customers, undermining the effectiveness of existing regulations [3] Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest that local governments should coordinate efforts across multiple departments to manage smoking in challenging areas like hallways and elevators, and establish designated outdoor smoking zones [4] - There is a call for the establishment of a national smoking control law to standardize regulations and eliminate regional disparities [3][4]