公厕的特殊性，决定了其治理上的先天困难。它既是法律意义上的公共场所，又是高度私密的个体 空间；是违规高发地，却没办法加以常规监控。这使得任何治理手段都面临边界问题。 近日，网络上流传"深圳某商场公厕安装了'吸烟即透明'的厕所门"一事，引发广泛讨论。据称，该 装置通过烟感联动电控调光玻璃，一旦检测到烟雾，原本不透明的门板会瞬间变为透明。 这一技术在厕所控烟方面的应用可能性已引发了网上两极化反应。支持者认为这是精准打击公共场 所吸烟的"黑科技"，应该推广。反对者则质疑其侵犯隐私，担心技术误判导致无辜者"社死"。无论如 何，激烈的讨论本身已反映出一种现实困境与集体情绪。在长期的无力感中，市民容易对"一键解决"的 方案抱以期待。 事实上，这场争议已触及到公共空间长期存在却难以解决的问题——在公共厕所这样高度私密、又 频繁违规的空间里，控烟该如何实现? 公共场所管理者不要试图用"自动变透明"的方式来一劳永逸解决问题。面对公共场所控烟这样的治 理难题，需要的不是博眼球的黑科技，而是更系统、更人性的解决方案。例如，完全可以利用烟感技术 联动声音警报，或将信号发送至保洁与安保人员的后台终端，进行及时的劝阻与取证。这种做法既能 ...

近日，有网友在深圳罗湖一大厦的男厕所拍到了一扇特殊的门——上面写着"吸烟将使玻璃门变透明"。该网友跟记者表示，厕所总共5个隔间，并非每个 门都是，"其中有两扇门是这种设计。"帖子一出，迅速引发热议，有网友评论："建议全国推广！" 针对网络流传的"商场客服否认"说法，记者调查发现系信息错位导致。网络流传视频上定位在"金展珠宝广场"，导致网友误以为是该商场，实则是定位信 息存在偏差，实为相邻的水贝金座大厦。 该大厦工作人员表示，水贝金座大厦确实安装了4到5个"吸烟会变透明"的门，"主要为了解决在厕所私密空间里控烟难的问题，我们大厦本身就是禁烟 的。" 工作人员介绍，其工作原理是：当隔间内的烟雾报警器感应到吸烟产生的烟雾后，会触发电流使玻璃瞬间从雾化状态变为透明，以便管理人员"及时发 现、及时管控"。目前，这类门主要安装在客流量较大的负一楼东区，已投入使用三四个月。 律师认为，根据各地公共场所控制吸烟条例的规定，商场作为公共场所有权对吸烟行为进行管理，但是需要采取合理合法手段。虽然商场贴了提示语，但 厕所隔间属于相对私密的空间，如厕行为是自然人不愿被他人窥探的私人活动，受民法典隐私权保护。而且设备还可能因故障误触发 ...

Core Viewpoint - The enforcement of smoking bans in public places is inconsistent, leading to health risks from secondhand smoke and increased fire hazards [1][2][3] Group 1: Public Health Concerns - Many readers express concerns about smoking in public places, highlighting the dangers of secondhand smoke to non-smokers [1] - Smoking in venues with flammable materials poses significant fire risks, as illustrated by an incident at a wedding where smoking occurred in a carpeted hall with obstructed fire safety systems [2] Group 2: Regulatory Framework - Although there is no national smoking ban, various local regulations exist that prohibit smoking in indoor public spaces, with penalties for violations [2][3] - Specific fines are outlined in local laws, such as Wuhan's regulations, which impose fines on individuals and venue operators for non-compliance [2] Group 3: Enforcement Challenges - The execution of smoking bans is hindered by a lack of clarity regarding enforcement responsibilities among different regulatory bodies [3] - Some public venue operators adopt a lenient approach towards smoking to avoid alienating customers, undermining the effectiveness of existing regulations [3] Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest that local governments should coordinate efforts across multiple departments to manage smoking in challenging areas like hallways and elevators, and establish designated outdoor smoking zones [4] - There is a call for the establishment of a national smoking control law to standardize regulations and eliminate regional disparities [3][4]