（来源：光明日报） 转自：光明日报 【资政场】 人工智能、信息技术在国家和社会治理领域的应用，深刻地改变了传统的治理理念和治理模式。从 数据采集、电子布防到智慧决策等，技术在社会治理中的广泛应用，完成了从工具性支持到系统性嵌入 的转变，技术治理不断驱动治理创新、重塑治理格局。在为人们提供诸多便利、为治理提升显著效能的 同时，诸如信息安全、隐私外泄、数字鸿沟甚至主体异化等问题，也引发了人们对技术治理的重新审 视。 这要求在技术的设计、开发和应用中应优先考虑人的因素和价值导向。满足人民对美好生活的需求 是技术治理的终极价值。 一方面，聚焦医疗、教育、就业等民生关切领域，发挥工具理性向导作用，填补传统行政治理的治 理缝隙，优化资源配置，提升治理效率；另一方面，将道德、责任要求转化为代码层面的约束，并加快 技术治理评估的体系化建设。我国在2019年发布的《新一代人工智能治理原则——发展负责任的人工智 能》要求将负责任创新评估作为技术研发的前置条件，2021年发布的《新一代人工智能伦理规范》强调 在数据采集和算法开发中加强风险管控审查，2023年发布的《人工智能安全标准化白皮书（2023版）》 为AI安全设立了标准的体 ...

公厕的特殊性，决定了其治理上的先天困难。它既是法律意义上的公共场所，又是高度私密的个体 空间；是违规高发地，却没办法加以常规监控。这使得任何治理手段都面临边界问题。 近日，网络上流传"深圳某商场公厕安装了'吸烟即透明'的厕所门"一事，引发广泛讨论。据称，该 装置通过烟感联动电控调光玻璃，一旦检测到烟雾，原本不透明的门板会瞬间变为透明。 这一技术在厕所控烟方面的应用可能性已引发了网上两极化反应。支持者认为这是精准打击公共场 所吸烟的"黑科技"，应该推广。反对者则质疑其侵犯隐私，担心技术误判导致无辜者"社死"。无论如 何，激烈的讨论本身已反映出一种现实困境与集体情绪。在长期的无力感中，市民容易对"一键解决"的 方案抱以期待。 事实上，这场争议已触及到公共空间长期存在却难以解决的问题——在公共厕所这样高度私密、又 频繁违规的空间里，控烟该如何实现? 公共场所管理者不要试图用"自动变透明"的方式来一劳永逸解决问题。面对公共场所控烟这样的治 理难题，需要的不是博眼球的黑科技，而是更系统、更人性的解决方案。例如，完全可以利用烟感技术 联动声音警报，或将信号发送至保洁与安保人员的后台终端，进行及时的劝阻与取证。这种做法既能 ...

Group 1 - The core event is a dinner hosted by Trump at the White House, attended by 24 tech and business leaders, signaling an attempt to reshape relations with the tech industry [1][2] - Notably, Elon Musk's absence at the dinner is highlighted, following a public dispute with Trump that resulted in a significant drop in Tesla's market value [1] - The dinner marks the first appearance of the newly renovated Rose Garden, which Trump aimed to replicate the outdoor dining environment of his Mar-a-Lago club [3][4] Group 2 - The dinner is set against a backdrop of improving relations between Trump and major tech companies, which had previously expressed hostility towards him [4] - U.S. digital tech companies have faced various restrictions from the EU, including hefty fines related to digital privacy and antitrust regulations [5] - The Democratic Party, which has received substantial donations from these tech companies, has not prioritized helping them navigate these regulatory challenges [6][7] Group 3 - Despite their previous opposition to Trump, digital tech companies recognize the value of his administration, particularly in opposing EU regulations that threaten their business models [9][11] - The shift in support from Silicon Valley towards Trump is evident, as tech elites have begun to distance themselves from the Democratic Party and liberal media [11] - Trump's administration has actively engaged in negotiations to reduce regulatory burdens on U.S. tech companies, indicating a potential alignment of interests [11][12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Elon Musk's recent political ambitions, including the establishment of a new political party, and critiques the underlying motivations and implications of such actions in the context of American politics and society [3][10]. Group 1: Musk's Political Aspirations - Musk's announcement of forming a new political party, referred to as the "American Party," is seen as a continuation of his political ambitions, which some view as a response to the perceived failures of existing political structures [10][12]. - The article argues that Musk's political ideals are not aligned with the majority of American voters, suggesting that his views are more representative of a niche group within Silicon Valley rather than the broader electorate [12][15]. Group 2: Ideological Underpinnings - The article highlights that Musk and other Silicon Valley figures, such as Peter Thiel, possess distinct political ideals that are intertwined with their business interests, suggesting that their political actions are driven by a desire to protect their economic empires [5][6]. - It is noted that Musk's vision of establishing a utopia on Mars reflects a broader desire among certain right-wing factions to escape what they perceive as a deteriorating social order in the U.S. [8][9]. Group 3: Critique of Governance Philosophy - The article critiques Musk's approach to governance, arguing that his business-oriented mindset, which emphasizes cost-cutting and efficiency, is ill-suited for managing a nation, as it overlooks the complexities of societal needs [13][15]. - The tension between Musk's technological optimism and the realities of political governance is emphasized, suggesting that his reliance on technology as a panacea for societal issues is fundamentally flawed [19][21]. Group 4: Challenges Ahead - The article points out the inherent challenges Musk faces in establishing a viable political party, including the difficulty of gaining traction in a political landscape dominated by two major parties and the need to build local support networks [16][24]. - It concludes that Musk's political endeavors are likely to fail due to a disconnect with the broader electorate and the complexities of American political dynamics [15][24].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing prevalence of personal information infringement in China, emphasizing the need for stronger legal protections and governance mechanisms to combat the illegal acquisition and sale of personal data [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework - In recent years, China has accelerated its legislative process to protect personal information, including the introduction and revision of relevant laws such as the Personal Information Protection Law [2]. - Despite these legal advancements, personal information infringement remains high due to low penalties for offenders and the high profitability of illegal data trading [2]. Group 2: Challenges in Personal Information Protection - The channels for collecting personal information have become more diverse, increasing the risk of data breaches as consumers frequently provide personal data in various scenarios such as shopping and online services [2][3]. - The leakage and sale of personal information have become widespread, necessitating a multi-faceted approach to governance that includes both technological advancements and source governance [3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - There is a need for continuous upgrades in technical measures and stricter penalties to address the evolving challenges posed by data privacy violations, including new issues arising from technologies like AI [3]. - Establishing robust mechanisms for proactive monitoring and regulation of third-party platforms and merchants that handle personal information is crucial to prevent mishandling and protect consumer rights [3].