本文来自微信公众号：无法可说，作者：郑渝川hiecy，题图来自：视觉中国 9月4日，特朗普在白宫举办科技领袖晚宴，苹果CEO库克、Meta CEO扎克伯格、微软联合创始人比尔· 盖茨等二十四位科技和商业领袖受邀出席。 马斯克的缺席格外引人关注。此前，马斯克和特朗普围绕"大漂亮"法案、政府补贴及高层人事任命等问 题激烈交锋，导致特斯拉市值一日蒸发超1500亿美元。特朗普甚至公开威胁终止与马斯克旗下企业的政 府合同，令市场情绪进一步承压。 这次晚宴有一个重要的政治背景。美国这些数字科技巨头对于特朗普的敌意，其实已经大大消除。 从微软到谷歌，从苹果到Meta，美国的数字科技企业长期以来被欧盟设定了各种限制，无论是数字隐 私权还是反垄断条款，动辄就是巨额罚款。 美国的数字科技企业为民主党阵营捐款众多，但民主党人与欧洲的社会民主党本身是意识形态联盟，对 于帮助美国数字科技企业摆脱这类监管困境，并没有放在心上。 甚至而言，美国民主党阵营也部分认同欧盟对于数字科技企业的监管逻辑。 实话而言，美国的这些数字科技企业并不喜欢特朗普。特朗普利益集团宣扬的很多观点，被认为具有高 度的反智性，数字科技企业实在爱不起来，比如疫苗有害论 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Elon Musk's recent political ambitions, including the establishment of a new political party, and critiques the underlying motivations and implications of such actions in the context of American politics and society [3][10]. Group 1: Musk's Political Aspirations - Musk's announcement of forming a new political party, referred to as the "American Party," is seen as a continuation of his political ambitions, which some view as a response to the perceived failures of existing political structures [10][12]. - The article argues that Musk's political ideals are not aligned with the majority of American voters, suggesting that his views are more representative of a niche group within Silicon Valley rather than the broader electorate [12][15]. Group 2: Ideological Underpinnings - The article highlights that Musk and other Silicon Valley figures, such as Peter Thiel, possess distinct political ideals that are intertwined with their business interests, suggesting that their political actions are driven by a desire to protect their economic empires [5][6]. - It is noted that Musk's vision of establishing a utopia on Mars reflects a broader desire among certain right-wing factions to escape what they perceive as a deteriorating social order in the U.S. [8][9]. Group 3: Critique of Governance Philosophy - The article critiques Musk's approach to governance, arguing that his business-oriented mindset, which emphasizes cost-cutting and efficiency, is ill-suited for managing a nation, as it overlooks the complexities of societal needs [13][15]. - The tension between Musk's technological optimism and the realities of political governance is emphasized, suggesting that his reliance on technology as a panacea for societal issues is fundamentally flawed [19][21]. Group 4: Challenges Ahead - The article points out the inherent challenges Musk faces in establishing a viable political party, including the difficulty of gaining traction in a political landscape dominated by two major parties and the need to build local support networks [16][24]. - It concludes that Musk's political endeavors are likely to fail due to a disconnect with the broader electorate and the complexities of American political dynamics [15][24].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing prevalence of personal information infringement in China, emphasizing the need for stronger legal protections and governance mechanisms to combat the illegal acquisition and sale of personal data [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework - In recent years, China has accelerated its legislative process to protect personal information, including the introduction and revision of relevant laws such as the Personal Information Protection Law [2]. - Despite these legal advancements, personal information infringement remains high due to low penalties for offenders and the high profitability of illegal data trading [2]. Group 2: Challenges in Personal Information Protection - The channels for collecting personal information have become more diverse, increasing the risk of data breaches as consumers frequently provide personal data in various scenarios such as shopping and online services [2][3]. - The leakage and sale of personal information have become widespread, necessitating a multi-faceted approach to governance that includes both technological advancements and source governance [3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - There is a need for continuous upgrades in technical measures and stricter penalties to address the evolving challenges posed by data privacy violations, including new issues arising from technologies like AI [3]. - Establishing robust mechanisms for proactive monitoring and regulation of third-party platforms and merchants that handle personal information is crucial to prevent mishandling and protect consumer rights [3].