Core Viewpoint - Google is under investigation by the European Commission for potentially using copyrighted material from publishers to train its AI models without proper compensation [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation focuses on Google's use of articles from news publishers and videos from YouTube for its "AI Overviews" and "AI Mode" features [1][2]. - EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera emphasized that while AI brings innovation, it should not compromise societal principles [4]. Group 2: Implications and Reactions - The investigation may escalate tensions between the EU and the Trump administration, which has criticized the EU's actions against US tech companies [5]. - A Google spokesperson warned that the inquiry could hinder innovation in a highly competitive market, asserting that Europeans should benefit from new technologies [5]. - In September, the EU fined Google $3.4 billion for breaching competition rules related to advertising technology, which was labeled as "discriminatory" by President Trump [6]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Other tech firms, like Meta, are also navigating the AI landscape, with Meta recently securing licensing deals with major publishers amid competition with Google [9].

Core Viewpoint - Meta has won a significant copyright case regarding its Llama AI model, with the judge ruling that the company's use of books for training is protected under the fair use doctrine of U.S. copyright law, although the ruling is limited to this specific case [2][4][5]. Group 1: Legal Ruling and Implications - U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria sided with Meta, stating that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that Meta's use of books caused market harm [2][3]. - The judge acknowledged that while it is generally illegal to copy protected works without permission, the plaintiffs did not present a compelling argument against Meta's practices [3][4]. - Chhabria emphasized that the ruling does not imply that Meta's use of copyrighted materials is lawful in all cases, leaving the possibility for other authors to pursue similar lawsuits [6]. Group 2: Meta's Position and Industry Context - A Meta spokesperson expressed appreciation for the court's decision, highlighting the importance of fair use in fostering innovation in open-source AI models [5]. - The judge noted flaws in Meta's defense, particularly the argument that prohibiting the use of copyrighted text would hinder the development of generative AI technologies, which he dismissed as "nonsense" [6]. - The ruling comes in the context of other ongoing legal challenges in the AI industry, as seen with Anthropic's case regarding the use of pirated books for training its AI model [6].