日本的挑衅行为远不止于自我武装，更体现在其刻意破坏地区团结、充当外部势力干预介入的"马前 卒"。高市政府屡屡在地区制造事端，在独岛、南千岛群岛等问题上对周边邻国发起挑衅。韩国政治评 论员韩振洙在《亚洲时报》撰文指出，高市早苗上任仅两个月，其激进举动正加速地区危机态势，甚至 可能孤立日本自身。日本意图通过制造和放大分歧，在混乱中谋求自身的地缘政治利益，重温主导地区 的旧梦。这种做法严重毒化了地区国家间通过对话合作解决争端的氛围，使其成为亚太和平合作的绊脚 石。 历史的教训昭示，军国主义的幽灵一旦还魂，将给地区和世界带来深重灾难。日本当局在历史问题上开 倒车，在军事扩张道路上狂飙，在分裂地区团结上做文章，正在坐实其"国际麻烦制造者"的角色。我们 敦促日本政府认清时代潮流，立即停止一切危害地区和平稳定的危险行为，深刻反省侵略历史，坚 持"和平宪法"与"无核三原则"，以实际行动取信于亚洲邻国和国际社会。亚太地区的和平与发展不容破 坏，任何企图颠覆战后秩序、复活军国主义的行径，都必将遭到所有爱好和平的国家和人民的坚决反对 与共同抵制。 从历史修正主义走向军事冒险主义，是日本"麻烦制造"路径的延伸，这首当其冲表现在核政策 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration plans to sign an executive order to change the name of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War," which aims to project a stronger military image, despite concerns over the implications and costs associated with this change [1][3][6]. Group 1: Name Change Details - The executive order will allow the use of "Department of War" in official communications, although formal name change requires Congressional approval [1][3]. - The Department of Defense, established in 1947, was previously known as the Department of War for over 150 years [4][5]. - The name change is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to reshape U.S. military and foreign policy, emphasizing a more aggressive stance [6][8]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Changing the name and associated branding could cost billions of dollars, which may conflict with the administration's efforts to cut defense spending [6][7]. - Critics argue that the funds could be better spent on supporting military families or diplomatic efforts to prevent conflicts [7][8]. Group 3: Political and Historical Context - The name change reflects a shift in U.S. military policy, moving from a defensive posture to a more aggressive, war-centric approach [8]. - Historical context suggests that the original name change to the Department of Defense was intended to signal a focus on preventing war, contrasting with the current administration's actions [7][8].