#日本这艘破船彻底右转了#【#日本还是那么爱赌国运#】日本，真的要彻底向右转了，而且转得越来越 急。日本政府已确定将于2月18日召开特别国会，举行首相指名选举。按照程序，现任内阁将集体辞 职，众参两院分别投票。日媒普遍认为，高市早苗会顺利通过指名选举几无悬念。日本修宪的门槛已经 被实质性地砍断了，日本这艘破船彻底右转了。太阳底下没有新鲜事，日本还是那么爱赌国运，在重蹈 覆辙的路上一路狂奔。历史上，日本全国向右转已经有不少值得警惕的先例。1931年爆发的"九·一八事 变"，1932年主张克制对外扩张的首相犬养毅在官邸被少壮军官枪杀，以及1936年又一批军官发动"二二 六事件"，背后都有日本政府强化"国家紧急状态"叙事，以外部威胁为由推动军备扩张的影子，同时伴 有舆论环境右倾化，媒体和教育系统强化民族主义与对外敌意，最后反对声音被边缘化甚至清除，只剩 一路狂奔的战车。战后，日本并没有真正彻底清算这种思维，经过了安倍解禁集体自卫权，现在轮到高 市了。她上台区区四个月，如今高票当选靠的不是创造了什么经济奇迹，而是打了一手情绪牌：经济 上，在日元贬值、通胀高企，普通人生活吃紧的时候"画饼"承诺刺激政策和暂停消费税；政治 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the dangerous implications of Japanese Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide's efforts to create an environment for visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, which symbolizes Japan's militaristic past and its historical injustices [1][2] - The Yasukuni Shrine is not merely a religious site but a symbol of Japan's militarism, housing the spirits of 14 Class-A war criminals responsible for severe atrocities during World War II, including the Nanjing Massacre and the use of comfort women [1][2] - The issue surrounding the Yasukuni Shrine is a significant political matter that reflects Japan's ability to confront its invasion history and respect the sentiments of affected Asian nations [1][2] Group 2 - Japanese right-wing forces have long attempted to revise history, promoting a distorted view that frames Japan's invasions as self-defense and liberation efforts, which undermines historical accountability [2] - The obsession of Japanese right-wing politicians with the Yasukuni Shrine is linked to their broader military provocations, including the push for new security laws and increased defense budgets, indicating a desire to escape post-war constraints [2] - The historical accountability regarding the Yasukuni Shrine is non-negotiable, and any challenges to this issue by Japanese right-wing forces will likely worsen relations with neighboring countries and isolate Japan internationally [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding the creation of an environment for visiting the Yasukuni Shrine reflect a disregard for historical justice and reveal the sinister intentions of Japanese right-wing forces to revive militarism [1][2] Group 1: Historical Context - The Yasukuni Shrine is not merely a religious site but a symbol and tool of Japanese militarism, honoring 14 Class A war criminals responsible for severe atrocities during Japan's invasions, including the Nanjing Massacre and the forced recruitment of "comfort women" [1] - The issue surrounding the Yasukuni Shrine is a significant political matter that pertains to Japan's ability to correctly acknowledge and address its history of invasion, respect the sentiments of affected Asian nations, and adhere to basic international relations principles [1] Group 2: Political Implications - The right-wing forces in Japan have long attempted to distort historical narratives, promoting a "Yasukuni view of history" that denies invasion history and glorifies colonial rule, framing Japan's invasions as "self-defense" and "liberation wars" for Asian nations [2] - The obsession of Japanese right-wing politicians with the Yasukuni Shrine is intertwined with recent provocations in Japan's military security policies, including the passage of new security laws and significant increases in defense budgets, indicating a desire to escape post-war constraints [2] Group 3: International Relations - The ongoing challenges posed by Japanese right-wing forces regarding the Yasukuni Shrine will likely worsen relations with neighboring countries and further isolate Japan in the international community [2] - This year marks the 80th anniversary of the Tokyo Trials, emphasizing the need for Japan to confront and reflect on its invasion history, particularly regarding sensitive historical issues like the Yasukuni Shrine [2]

靖国神社这笔历史账，没有任何讨价还价的余地。日本右翼势力若执意在靖国神社问题上挑战底线，只 会进一步恶化同邻国的关系，让自身在国际社会中更加孤立。 靖国神社绝非普通宗教场所，而是日本军国主义发动对外侵略战争的精神工具和象征，供奉着对侵略战 争负有严重罪责的14名甲级战犯。以他们为代表的日本军国主义者将整个亚洲拖入血与火的深渊，犯下 南京大屠杀、强征"慰安妇"、细菌战、强征劳工等滔天罪行，给包括中国在内的亚洲各国人民带来深重 灾难，也令日本人民深受其害。 靖国神社问题，是关乎日本能否正确认识和对待侵略历史、能否尊重亚洲受害国人民感情、能否遵守国 际关系基本准则的重大政治问题。参拜靖国神社，就是为军国主义招魂，就是对人类公理正义的践踏挑 衅。企图为参拜靖国神社营造所谓的"环境"，就是开历史倒车，就是冲击世界特别是亚洲的和平稳定。 长期以来，日本右翼势力混淆视听，企图为侵略历史翻案。以"靖国史观"为代表的历史修正主义，否认 侵略历史，美化殖民统治，将日本发动的侵略战争歪曲为"自卫战争"和"亚洲各民族的独立解放战争"。 当日本政客声称要去靖国神社"尊崇"和"缅怀"时，实则是在向这种歪曲的历史观顶礼膜拜，在为军国主 义 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the dangerous implications of Japanese Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide's efforts to create an environment conducive to visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, which symbolizes Japan's militaristic past and its historical injustices [1][2] - The Yasukuni Shrine is not merely a religious site but a symbol of Japan's militarism, housing the spirits of 14 Class-A war criminals responsible for atrocities during Japan's invasions, including the Nanjing Massacre and the forced recruitment of "comfort women" [1][2] - The issue surrounding the Yasukuni Shrine is a significant political matter that reflects Japan's ability to confront its invasion history, respect the sentiments of affected Asian nations, and adhere to basic international relations principles [1][2] Group 2 - Japanese right-wing forces have long attempted to revise history, promoting a distorted view that frames Japan's invasions as "self-defense" and "liberation" efforts, thereby undermining the true nature of its wartime actions [2] - The obsession of Japanese right-wing politicians with the Yasukuni Shrine is intertwined with their provocative actions in military security, including the passage of new security laws and significant increases in defense budgets [2] - The historical accountability regarding the Yasukuni Shrine is non-negotiable, and any continued challenges to this issue by Japanese right-wing forces will likely worsen relations with neighboring countries and isolate Japan in the international community [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential rise of militarism in Japan under Prime Minister Sanna Takagi, who may open a "Pandora's box" by pursuing constitutional amendments, military expansion, and historical revisionism, posing a significant threat to regional peace and stability in East Asia [1][8]. Constitutional Amendment - Takagi aims to amend Japan's "Peace Constitution," specifically Article 9, which renounces war and prohibits maintaining military forces. This amendment would redefine the Self-Defense Forces as a military entity, fundamentally altering Japan's defense posture from "defensive" to militarized [3][4]. - The constitutional change requires a two-thirds majority in the Diet, which could lead to the dismantling of post-war peace frameworks established by international agreements [3]. Military Expansion - The military expansion under Takagi's leadership is marked by a significant increase in defense spending, with the 2026 fiscal year budget projected to reach 9.04 trillion yen, marking a 14-year consecutive growth [4]. - Japan is developing offensive capabilities, including missiles with ranges exceeding 1,000 kilometers, and is forming a "Space Operations Group" to extend military reach into space [4]. - There are attempts to relax restrictions on arms exports and establish a "frontline deterrence system" in response to regional threats, which could escalate military tensions in the Asia-Pacific [4]. Historical Revisionism - Takagi's administration is characterized by a troubling trend of historical revisionism, undermining the acknowledgment of Japan's wartime atrocities, such as the Nanjing Massacre and the issue of "comfort women" [5]. - This revisionist stance serves as a foundation for both constitutional amendments and military expansion, creating a dangerous cycle where militarization is justified by a distorted historical narrative [5][7]. Interconnected Threats - The three threats of constitutional amendment, military expansion, and historical revisionism are interlinked, with each aspect reinforcing the others. Takagi's rhetoric connects Taiwan's situation to Japan's self-defense, using it as a pretext for military growth [7]. - The article emphasizes that the resurgence of militarism in Japan is not an isolated incident but a culmination of decades of right-wing political trends and external influences, particularly from the U.S. [7][8]. Hope for Peace - Despite the ominous developments, there remains hope in the form of international opposition to Japan's militarization, with calls for collective action to uphold post-war peace and encourage Japan to confront its historical responsibilities [8].

Group 1 - The international community is responding rationally and objectively to the erroneous statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, emphasizing that adherence to the One China principle is a universal consensus [1][3][7] - Various countries, including Lesotho and Senegal, have reiterated their commitment to the One China principle, stating that Taiwan is part of China and calling for respect for historical facts and international relations [3][7] - Criticism from Zambia highlights that Takaichi's statements are seen as a provocation and a threat to international peace, suggesting that Japan's rhetoric signals a resurgence of militarism [5][9] Group 2 - Brazilian political science professor Cristina Pescequillo argues that Japan's historical revisionism is part of a broader trend that aligns with far-right conservative forces, potentially leading to increased global instability [9] - The statements from various international figures indicate a growing concern over Japan's political motivations, which are perceived as undermining established cooperative relationships amid political disagreements [9]

Group 1 - The international community is responding rationally and objectively to the erroneous remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, emphasizing that adherence to the One China principle is a common consensus among nations [1][3][5] - Lesotho's Minister of Information, Communications, Technology and Innovation, Mohlohi, stated that individual politicians' remarks should respect historical facts and the basic principles of international relations, reaffirming Lesotho's commitment to the One China principle [1] - Zambian MP Emmanuel Tembo described Takaichi's comments as provocative and a threat to international peace, urging the Japanese government to retract these statements [3] Group 2 - Senegalese journalist Amadou Diop highlighted that the One China principle is a universal consensus, including Senegal's recognition of Taiwan as part of China, and called for Japan to cease its provocative actions [5] - Cristina Pescequillo, an associate professor of international politics at the Federal University of São Paulo, argued that Japan's historical revisionism is part of a broader trend that aligns with far-right conservative forces, contributing to global instability [7] - The erroneous remarks from Japan are seen as politically motivated and detrimental to the cooperative relationships that have been gradually established amid political differences [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's stance on historical issues, particularly regarding the "comfort women" controversy, highlighting her attempts to downplay Japan's wartime responsibilities and promote a narrative that challenges the post-war international order [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Takaichi's characterization of the "Taiwan contingency" as a potential "survival crisis" for Japan reflects her confrontational attitude towards post-war international norms and historical accountability [1]. - Her approach to the "comfort women" issue is marked by a refusal to engage in genuine reflection, instead opting for a combative stance that seeks to delegitimize the narratives of historical accountability from China and South Korea [1][2]. - Takaichi has been involved in efforts to revise Japan's historical narrative since at least 1997, advocating for a "correction" of what she perceives as a self-deprecating historical view [1]. Group 2: Rhetoric and Responsibility - Takaichi employs two main rhetorical strategies regarding the "comfort women" issue: one that disputes the terminology used and another that denies the existence of state responsibility for the coercive nature of the system [2]. - The term "comfort women" has been established in academic discourse to refer specifically to women forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military, despite Takaichi's attempts to redefine it [2][3]. - The "Kono Statement," which acknowledges the Japanese military's involvement in the "comfort women" system, is a critical document that Takaichi's narrative seeks to undermine, as it contradicts her claims of non-coercion [3]. Group 3: International Response - The article calls for regional countries and the international community to uphold historical justice and the post-war international order in response to Takaichi's dual revisionism [4]. - There is an emphasis on the need to counter any attempts to glorify aggression or justify war through factual evidence and international law [4].

Core Viewpoint - Japan is accelerating its militarization efforts, including increasing defense spending, modifying its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," lifting restrictions on arms exports, and developing offensive military capabilities, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism in the region [1][2][4]. Defense Budget and Military Expansion - The defense budget for the fiscal year 2026 is set to exceed 9 trillion yen, marking a historic high, with a significant increase of 3.6 trillion yen from the fiscal year 2022 budget of 5.4 trillion yen [1][2]. - The government plans to lift restrictions on five types of arms exports, indicating a substantial relaxation of arms export policies [1][2]. - The current government is focusing on developing offensive military capabilities, which represents a shift from Japan's post-war defense principles [2][4]. Military Strategy and Capabilities - Japan is constructing a coastal defense system centered around drones and is procuring hypersonic missiles and upgraded anti-ship missiles [2][3]. - The Japan Air Self-Defense Force will be renamed to the Japan Aerospace Self-Defense Force, and a new Space Operations Group will be established [2][3]. - The military strategy is shifting from passive defense to proactive deterrence, with a focus on enhancing capabilities for preemptive strikes and expanding military operations [4][5]. Political and Historical Context - The current government's militarization efforts are seen as a continuation of the right-wing political agenda, which seeks to amend the constitution and strengthen military capabilities [4][6]. - The government is leveraging perceived external threats to consolidate domestic political support and justify military expansion [6][7]. - There are concerns that Japan's militarization reflects a resurgence of militaristic ideologies, reminiscent of pre-World War II expansionism [7][8]. International Implications - Japan's military actions, including potential involvement in Taiwan, signal a significant shift in its defense posture and could exacerbate regional tensions [8][9]. - The international community is urged to uphold post-war legal frameworks to prevent the resurgence of militarism and maintain regional peace [10].