Core Viewpoint - After its IPO, the company "倍轻松" has experienced significant performance deterioration, raising concerns about the authenticity of its financials due to frequent changes in its CFO and substantial discrepancies in sales expenses before and after listing [1][3][5]. Group 1: Financial Performance - The company reported a drastic change in performance post-IPO, with continuous losses following a period of high revenue growth prior to listing [3][5]. - In 2022, 2023, and 2024, the company achieved revenues of 895 million, 1.275 billion, and 1.085 billion respectively, with net profits of -130 million, -55 million, and -3 million, marking three consecutive years of losses [5][6]. - The company's revenue peaked at 1.275 billion in 2023, but the first quarter of 2025 saw a 32.83% year-on-year decline in revenue [5]. Group 2: Sales Expenses and Employee Compensation - There is a notable discrepancy in sales expenses, with a significant increase in employee compensation post-IPO despite stable sales personnel numbers [19][21]. - The average salary for sales personnel rose from approximately 115,000 before the IPO to around 155,000 after, despite a decline in sales revenue [21][19]. - The company's sales expense ratio has increased dramatically, reaching as high as 54% post-IPO, compared to around 40% before [14][16]. Group 3: Marketing and Revenue Generation - The company has heavily invested in online marketing, with promotional expenses accounting for 64% of total sales expenses in 2023, raising questions about the sustainability of its business model [22][23]. - The online revenue constituted nearly 70% of total sales in 2023, but the high marketing costs have led to unprofitable operations [22][26]. - There are concerns about potential "fake orders" to inflate sales figures, as the company has reported significant promotional spending without corresponding profit [22][26]. Group 4: Corporate Governance and Control - The frequent turnover of the CFO raises red flags regarding corporate governance and financial oversight, with three CFOs in a short span [8][29]. - Allegations have emerged regarding the actual controller's potential misuse of company funds through suppliers, which could further undermine the integrity of financial reporting [29][30]. - The company has been scrutinized for its relationships with suppliers, where funds appear to be funneled to the actual controller, raising concerns about financial transparency [29][31].