Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of controversial internet celebrities, often referred to as "bad influencers," who have been banned from platforms but continue to thrive by shifting to other platforms or offline ventures, highlighting the paradox of internet censorship and audience engagement [2][25]. Group 1: Revival of Bad Influencers - Many influencers who faced bans on domestic platforms have successfully transitioned to TikTok and other international platforms, demonstrating that bans are not always permanent [4][14]. - Influencer Tie Shan Kao, after a four-year hiatus, returned to the scene on TikTok, reportedly earning $200,000 in just six days, indicating a lucrative opportunity abroad [5][8]. - Other influencers, like Xiao Huang and Mao Yi Bei, have also found success on TikTok Southeast Asia, with significant follower growth and high earnings from live streams [8][11]. Group 2: Offline Ventures - Some influencers have shifted to offline businesses, such as milk tea shops and concerts, where they continue to attract large crowds and generate revenue despite previous bans [15][21]. - Influencer Guo Laoshi opened a milk tea shop that became immensely popular, with fans willing to wait hours to purchase, showcasing the power of brand loyalty [15][21]. - Another influencer, Na Yi Na, transformed her online persona into a successful offline concert career, emphasizing the emotional connection fans have with these figures [21][24]. Group 3: Internet Ecosystem Challenges - The article highlights the inconsistency in platform regulations, where bans on one platform do not necessarily apply to others, creating loopholes for influencers to exploit [25][27]. - Public sentiment is divided, with some expressing outrage over the revival of these influencers while others continue to support them, reflecting a complex relationship between audiences and controversial figures [25][27]. - The revival of these influencers raises questions about societal values and the willingness to accept individuals who have previously crossed ethical lines, indicating a broader issue within the internet ecosystem [28][29].