医疗企业董事长薪酬

Search documents
这些数据,揭开医疗企业董事长薪酬的遮羞布
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-19 01:21
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the high salaries of chairpersons in the A-share medical industry, highlighting discrepancies between their compensation and company performance, particularly in firms that have not turned a profit [2][3][9]. Group 1: Salary Comparisons - Among 4,231 listed companies, only 13 chairpersons earn over 10 million yuan annually, with the top three from the medical sector: WuXi AppTec (41.8 million yuan), Mindray (24.94 million yuan), and BeiGene (20.19 million yuan) [2][4]. - The average salary for chairpersons in the medical sector is 174,000 yuan, higher than the overall average of 137,000 yuan for all listed companies [4][8]. - In 2024, the average salaries for chairpersons in various medical sub-sectors showed a decline, with the pharmaceutical sector down 4.75% to 167,000 yuan, and medical services down 7.13% to 227,000 yuan [4][6]. Group 2: Discrepancies in Salary and Performance - Companies like BeiGene, which has never been profitable since its IPO, still pay their chairperson a salary of 20.19 million yuan despite significant losses, including a net loss of 4.978 billion yuan last year [9][11]. - Other companies, such as Rongchang Biologics and Junshi Biosciences, also exhibit high chairperson salaries despite continuous losses, raising questions about the justification for such compensation [11][9]. - The article notes that the correlation between chairperson salaries and company performance metrics like revenue and net profit is weak, with a correlation coefficient of only 0.52 with net profit [8]. Group 3: Ethical Considerations - The article raises concerns about the ethical implications of high salaries for chairpersons in companies facing legal issues or financial difficulties, such as WeiNing Health and Lao Bai Xing Pharmacy, where chairpersons continue to receive substantial compensation despite scandals [13][14]. - The medical industry, being sensitive to public health and welfare, necessitates responsible governance, and the continued high compensation for chairpersons amidst company troubles is viewed as unreasonable [15].