Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing the historical significance of Taiwan's return to China and condemns the "Taiwan independence" narrative that distorts this history [1][5]. Group 1: Historical Narratives - The article criticizes the Taiwanese authorities for promoting a distorted view of history regarding the end of World War II and Taiwan's status, particularly through the rhetoric of "end of war" and neglecting the contributions of the Chinese people in the anti-Japanese war [2][4]. - It highlights the deliberate omission of Taiwan's "Restoration Day" by Taiwanese officials, framing it as a "poisoned candy" and denying its significance in the context of Taiwan's return to China [3][5]. Group 2: Legal and International Context - The article discusses the "Taiwan status undecided theory," asserting that it is a fabricated narrative stemming from U.S. policies post-Korean War, which aims to undermine China's sovereignty over Taiwan [4]. - It references international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, countering claims made by Taiwanese officials and U.S. entities [3][4]. Group 3: Political Implications - The article argues that the actions of the Taiwanese authorities reflect a broader agenda of seeking independence through foreign support, particularly from the U.S. and Japan, which is viewed as a betrayal of national interests [5]. - It calls for unity among Chinese people to remember history and oppose separatist movements, emphasizing the inevitability of China's reunification [5].