以黎智英为首的反中乱港分子勾结外部势力，是港版"颜色革命"的幕后黑手，严重危害国家安全， 破坏香港繁荣稳定，损害香港市民根本利益和福祉，成为妨碍"一国两制"行稳致远和香港长治久安的祸 患。此患不除，香港不宁。2020年2月和4月，因涉嫌参与未经批准的集结等案件，黎智英两次被香港警 方拘捕。彼时，香港市民拍手称快，自发来到廉政公署、律政司等地附近举行集会，要求彻查其叛国乱 港罪行。 除患平乱，民之所盼。2020年6月30日，《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区维护国家安全法》颁布 实施。一法安香江，反中乱港分子无处遁逃。当年8月10日，黎智英涉嫌触犯香港国安法被拘捕。12 月，黎智英又因涉欺诈罪被收押候审。经审理，黎智英因犯有参与未经批准的集结罪、欺诈罪等被判处 相应时间的监禁，成为涉及多项罪行的服刑犯。2023年12月18日，黎智英涉嫌违反香港国安法案正式开 审。2024年7月25日，法庭裁定所有控罪表证成立。同年11月20日，黎智英开始作供，至2025年3月结 束。2025年8月18日至28日，各方进行结案陈词。12月15日，香港特区高等法院原讼法庭对黎智英依法 定罪。 在中国历史的浩荡长河中，数典忘祖、卖国求荣 ...

香港是中国的香港，维护国家安全理所当然。法槌落下，黎智英这个背叛国家和民族的罪人，终于受到 正义的审判。裁决结果告慰了在"修例风波"中受到伤害的无辜市民和勇毅执法者，让人再次相信"正义 不会迟到"。这也是对反华势力的郑重告诫：我们捍卫国家安全的决心和意志坚如磐石。反中乱港者的 图谋绝不会得逞，必遭严惩！（新华社记者） 除患平乱，民之所盼。2020年6月30日，《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区维护国家安全法》颁布实 施。一法安香江，反中乱港分子无处遁逃。当年8月10日，黎智英涉嫌触犯香港国安法被拘捕。12月， 黎智英又因涉欺诈罪被收押候审。经审理，黎智英因犯有参与未经批准的集结罪、欺诈罪等被判处相应 时间的监禁，成为涉及多项罪行的服刑犯。2023年12月18日，黎智英涉嫌违反香港国安法案正式开审。 2024年7月25日，法庭裁定所有控罪表证成立。同年11月20日，黎智英开始作供，至2025年3月结束。 2025年8月18日至28日，各方进行结案陈词。12月15日，香港特区高等法院原讼法庭对黎智英依法定 罪。 香港国安法第二十九条规定，请求外国或者境外机构、组织、人员实施对香港特别行政区或者中华人民 共和国进行制裁 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the legal consequences faced by Jimmy Lai, a prominent figure accused of colluding with foreign forces to undermine Hong Kong's stability and security, highlighting the importance of upholding national security laws in Hong Kong [1][4][6]. Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - On December 15, the Hong Kong High Court convicted Jimmy Lai of two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one count of conspiracy to publish seditious publications, marking a significant legal outcome for his actions against national security [1][4]. - The trial process was described as transparent, with both prosecution and defense presenting evidence, and the court ensuring that Lai received appropriate medical care during his detention [6]. Actions and Influence - Lai was identified as a key orchestrator of major anti-China movements in Hong Kong, including the illegal "Occupy Central" protests and the 2019 anti-extradition bill protests, where he used his media platforms to incite violence and undermine the government [2][4]. - Evidence presented in court indicated that Lai conspired with foreign entities to solicit sanctions against Hong Kong and China, demonstrating a clear intent to destabilize the region [5][6]. External Interference - The article criticizes Western politicians and media for attempting to interfere in the judicial process, labeling their actions as a violation of legal principles and an attempt to absolve Lai of his crimes [6][7]. - It asserts that external forces have been emboldened by figures like Lai, who have acted as agents for foreign interests, thereby complicating Hong Kong's governance and security [3][4][7]. National Security Implications - The actions of Lai and his associates are framed as a direct threat to national security and the principle of "One Country, Two Systems," necessitating strict legal repercussions to restore order and stability in Hong Kong [4][7]. - The article concludes with a strong affirmation of the commitment to uphold national security laws, asserting that the judicial outcome serves as a warning to those who seek to undermine Hong Kong's stability [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the unity and resilience of Hong Kong society in the face of disaster, while condemning external forces that attempt to exploit the situation for political gain [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A fire at Hong Kong's Tai Po Wang Fuk Court resulted in 159 fatalities as of December 3, with ongoing search and rescue operations [4]. - The Hong Kong government and various sectors of society have mobilized to provide support and aid for disaster relief efforts [2][3]. Group 2: Response to External Forces - The spokesperson warns against foreign hostile forces and local anti-China elements that are attempting to incite chaos under the guise of public petitions, reminiscent of past protests [2][3]. - The article highlights the collective efforts of the Hong Kong community and the support from mainland China, Macau, Taiwan, and overseas Chinese, showcasing a strong sense of solidarity [3]. Group 3: Legal and Security Measures - The spokesperson asserts that with the implementation of the National Security Law, any attempts to reignite unrest in Hong Kong will be met with severe legal consequences [3]. - It is stated that all actions against national security will be documented and pursued relentlessly, regardless of the perpetrators' locations [3].

Group 1 - The article highlights the immediate response and solidarity shown by the Hong Kong government and citizens following a major fire incident, emphasizing the importance of community support and resilience in times of crisis [1][2] - It discusses the negative impact of misinformation spread by certain groups attempting to exploit the tragedy for political gain, warning against the dangers of such actions [2] - The article stresses the urgent need for medical, housing, and psychological support for those affected by the fire, as well as the establishment of a cross-departmental investigation team to ensure transparency and truth [3] Group 2 - The narrative reflects on the broader implications of the fire, portraying it as a moment that reveals both the darkness of divisive actions and the light of community unity and strength [3] - It calls for collective responsibility among Hong Kong citizens to uphold truth and foster social harmony, emphasizing that the future of Hong Kong lies in the hands of those who choose kindness and trust [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the criticisms from the G7 and related Western countries regarding the law enforcement actions of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) government [1] Group 1 - The G7 and related Western countries have made statements attacking the Hong Kong police's actions against individuals involved in the so-called "illegal elections" of the "Hong Kong Parliament," labeling it as "transnational repression" [1] - The Chinese government asserts that the Hong Kong police's enforcement actions, based on the Hong Kong National Security Law and related regulations, are in accordance with international law and practices, and are reasonable, legal, and necessary [1] - The Chinese government criticizes the accusations of "transnational repression" as baseless, highlighting the hypocrisy of certain countries that impose unilateral sanctions while condemning the legitimate law enforcement actions of the Hong Kong police [1] Group 2 - The Chinese central government firmly supports the Hong Kong police in taking law enforcement actions against individuals and organizations that have fled overseas, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding national security and ensuring long-term stability in Hong Kong [1] - The Chinese government urges relevant countries and institutions to stop supporting anti-China elements in Hong Kong and to cease interference in China's internal affairs [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the G7 countries' criticism of Hong Kong's law enforcement actions against individuals involved in illegal election activities, labeling it as "transnational repression" [1] Group 1: Government Response - The Chinese government asserts that the actions taken by the Hong Kong police under the National Security Law are in accordance with international law and customary practices, deeming them reasonable, legal, and necessary [1] - The statement highlights that accusations from certain countries regarding "transnational repression" are unfounded and reveal hypocrisy and double standards [1] Group 2: Support for Law Enforcement - The central government of China firmly supports the Hong Kong police in their law enforcement actions against individuals and organizations that undermine national security, emphasizing the importance of maintaining long-term stability in Hong Kong [1] - The Chinese government urges foreign nations and organizations to cease their support for anti-China elements in Hong Kong and to stop interfering in China's internal affairs [1]