Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of AI on employment and the economy, emphasizing that the question of who will consume goods in a future dominated by AI is fundamentally about distribution systems rather than the capabilities of robots or capitalists [2][4]. Group 1: Impact of AI on Employment - AI is expected to have a profound impact on human jobs, potentially replacing a significant portion of both manual and cognitive labor, with predictions that up to 50% of jobs could be lost to AI in the next 15 years [4][6]. - The article highlights the historical context of technological revolutions, noting that AI extends human cognitive capabilities rather than just physical labor, which could lead to widespread job displacement [4][6]. - The disparity in agricultural employment between developed and developing countries is noted, with the U.S. having only 1.3% of its workforce in agriculture compared to China's 36.11%, yet the unemployment rates are relatively close [2]. Group 2: Distribution Systems - The article distinguishes between first distribution (by enterprises based on labor value) and second distribution (by government through fiscal policies), arguing that the latter is crucial for addressing job losses due to AI [6][9]. - The strength of social security systems in different countries is discussed, with Germany's robust unemployment benefits serving as a model for how to support displaced workers [7][9]. - The article emphasizes the need for a high capital density in the market to sustain social security systems, pointing out the significant difference in per capita capital between Germany and China [7][9]. Group 3: Solutions to Consumption Issues - The article suggests learning from Germany's model of citizen allowances and proposes the idea of universal basic income (UBI) as a solution to the consumption question in an AI-driven economy [9]. - Examples of UBI experiments in Canada and Finland are provided, showing positive outcomes such as increased educational pursuits and entrepreneurial activities among recipients [9].