Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that changes in retail sales growth are primarily influenced by residents' income levels and future income expectations rather than supply-demand dynamics in the consumer goods or services market [1][2] - It is essential to incorporate expected factors into macroeconomic analysis, moving beyond traditional supply-demand models to address the complexities of the current economic situation [1] - Long-term expectations of future income are significantly influenced by the trajectory of the distribution system, not just economic conditions [1] Group 2 - The discussion on improving the distribution system highlights the need for a coordinated system encompassing primary distribution, redistribution, and tertiary distribution, along with increased regulatory measures through taxation, social security, and transfer payments [1][2] - The focus of the redistribution system should be on individual residents rather than corporate intermediaries, and it is crucial to regulate wealth accumulation mechanisms that increasingly affect income distribution [2] - The recommendation for the "14th Five-Year Plan" period is to conduct analyses that are more aligned with China's realities, emphasizing reforms and opening up as fundamental to driving economic growth [2]

作为对网友的回答，我写过一篇文章《智能机器人取代了人类劳动：谁来消费商品？》，写着写着就跑偏了，忘了回答：谁来消费商品？ 其实这是个伪命题，我脑子里没这种问题，因为最终决定分配的，既不是智能机器人，也不是资本家。 在未来的十年，甚至是五年中，人类将感受到ai对就业的冲击，正如机械化、自动化对农业人口的冲击，发达国家的农业人口占比在２％左右，美国为 １.3%，只有200多万人从事农业劳动；中国约五亿，占比为36.11%。这么大的差距，但并不意味着美国的失业率会比中国高，2024年美国失业率是4.1%， 中国是5.2%。 所以，我关心的不是谁来消费商品？而是要好好学习，天天向上，如何与AI共存，deepseek的深度学习研究员没有被干掉，工薪从去年的50-80万，提升到 了今年最高154万元。被干掉的将是简单的重复性劳动，不管是体力劳动，还是脑力劳动。 进一步说，ai学习的速度会比教改更快，于是，大学很快将成为失业者培训基地，失业率的冲击是真实的，李开复说未来15年，50%的人类工作会被人工智 能取代。麦肯锡全球研究院预测，到二〇三〇年，全球将有四亿至八亿人因自动化失去岗位，其中印度、巴西等新兴市场受冲击比例可能 ...