Workflow
国家领土主权
icon
Search documents
高市早苗再次为“台湾有事”言论进行解释,称若台湾有事、美军受到袭击,日本不能袖手旁观,国防部回应
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao· 2026-01-29 23:41
(原标题:高市早苗再次为"台湾有事"言论进行解释,称若台湾有事、美军受到袭击,日本不能袖手旁 观,国防部回应) 来源:国防部发布 1月29日,国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人蒋斌大校主持国防部例行记者会。 蒋斌表示,钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿是中国固有领土。中方将继续采取有效措施,坚定维护国家领土主权和 海洋权益。 蒋斌:日方一再操弄涉台议题,粗暴干涉中国内政,中方已多次表明严正立场。日方在台湾问题上犯有 严重历史罪责,不仅不深刻反省,还妄图再次染指台湾,暴露出日本右翼势力推进"再军事化"、挑战战 后国际秩序的野心。我们敦促日方深刻汲取历史教训,恪守中日四个政治文件精神,慎重妥善处理涉台 问题。 "日本可能强登钓鱼岛",国防部回应 据"国防部发布"微信公众号消息,1月29日下午,国防部举行例行记者会,国防部新闻局副局长、国防 部新闻发言人蒋斌大校答记者问。 有记者提问,近日,日本冲绳县石垣市议会通过涉钓鱼岛条例,宣称对钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿和周边海域 的"可持续发展"进行所谓"管理"。外界担忧日本可能借此强登钓鱼岛开展所谓"登岛调查",请问发言人 有何评论? 1月29日下午,蒋斌大校答记者问。李晓伟 摄 记者:日本首 ...
欧洲多国回击美国关税威胁:“我们不会被勒索” 欧盟誓言团结捍卫主权
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2026-01-18 02:16
Core Viewpoint - President Trump announced a 10% tariff on all goods exported to the U.S. from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland starting February 1, which will increase to 25% on June 1 until an agreement is reached for the "complete and total purchase of Greenland" [1] Group 1: Reactions from Denmark - Danish Foreign Minister Rasmussen expressed that the U.S. tariff policy was "unexpected" and emphasized ongoing discussions with the EU [3] - Danish Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Poulsen stated that Trump's threats are "completely unacceptable" and highlighted the importance of international law and national sovereignty [3] Group 2: Reactions from Norway - Norwegian Prime Minister Støre stated that "there should be no threats between allies" and affirmed Norway's support for Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland [4] - Norwegian Foreign Minister Eide added that NATO recognizes the need to enhance security in the Arctic, including Greenland, and that tariff issues should not be part of this discussion [4] Group 3: Reactions from Sweden - Swedish Prime Minister Kristersson declared that "we will not be blackmailed" and emphasized that only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning them [5] - Sweden is currently in intensive consultations with other EU countries, Norway, and the UK to formulate a unified response [5] Group 4: Reactions from France - French President Macron deemed Trump's tariff threats as "unacceptable" and stated that European countries would respond in a united and coordinated manner if these threats are confirmed [6][5] Group 5: Reactions from the UK - UK Prime Minister Starmer criticized the imposition of tariffs on NATO allies as "completely wrong" and confirmed that the UK would engage directly with the U.S. government on this matter [7] Group 6: Reactions from Germany - German government spokesperson Stefan Cornelius noted awareness of Trump's comments and mentioned that Germany is consulting closely with European partners to decide on appropriate responses [8] Group 7: Reactions from Finland - Finnish President Stubb stated that issues between allies should be resolved through dialogue rather than pressure, warning that tariffs could harm transatlantic relations [9] Group 8: Reactions from the Netherlands - Dutch Foreign Minister Van Weyl indicated that the Netherlands is in close contact with EU partners to discuss response measures to the tariff announcement [10] Group 9: Reactions from the EU - EU Commission President von der Leyen and European Council President Costa warned that tariffs could damage transatlantic relations and lead to a dangerous vicious cycle [11] - The EU emphasized its commitment to unity and coordination, supporting Denmark and Greenland, and reaffirmed the importance of territorial integrity and sovereignty as fundamental principles of international law [12][13]
特朗普:对丹麦、挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰和芬兰加征关税
第一财经· 2026-01-18 00:25
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the announcement by U.S. President Trump regarding the imposition of tariffs on goods exported from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland to the U.S., starting from February 1, with an increase to 25% by June 1, contingent upon the purchase of Greenland [3]. Group 1: Responses from Various Countries - Sweden's Prime Minister Kristersson stated that Sweden will not be blackmailed and emphasized that only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning them [7]. - Denmark's Foreign Minister Rasmussen expressed that the U.S. tariff policy was unexpected and highlighted ongoing discussions with the EU [8]. - Norway's Prime Minister Støre affirmed that threats should not exist among allies and reiterated Norway's support for Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland [9]. - French President Macron labeled the tariff threats as unacceptable and indicated that European nations would respond in a united manner [11]. - Germany's government spokesperson noted that they are in close consultation with European partners to determine appropriate responses [12]. - The UK Prime Minister Starmer criticized the tariff plans as completely wrong and emphasized that the future of Greenland should be decided by its people and Denmark [15]. - The Netherlands is also in discussions with EU partners regarding the U.S. tariff announcement [16]. - Finland's President Stubb suggested that issues among allies should be resolved through dialogue rather than pressure [17]. Group 2: EU's Position - The EU Commission President von der Leyen and the European Council President Costa stated that the tariffs would damage transatlantic relations and could lead to a dangerous cycle [20]. - They reaffirmed solidarity with Denmark and Greenland and emphasized the importance of territorial integrity and sovereignty as fundamental principles of international law [20].
美国因格陵兰岛问题对欧洲8国加征关税,多国回应:不可接受
21世纪经济报道· 2026-01-17 23:08
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the announcement by U.S. President Trump regarding the imposition of tariffs on goods exported from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland, starting February 1, with an increase to 25% from June 1, contingent upon the purchase of Greenland [1]. Group 1: Responses from Sweden and Denmark - Sweden's Prime Minister Kristersson stated that Sweden will not be blackmailed and emphasized that only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning them [3]. - Denmark's Foreign Minister Rasmussen expressed that the U.S. tariff policy was unexpected and highlighted ongoing discussions with the EU regarding the situation [5]. Group 2: Responses from Norway and France - Norway's Prime Minister Støre asserted that there should be no threats among allies and reaffirmed Norway's support for Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland [6]. - French President Macron labeled the tariff threats as unacceptable and indicated that European nations would respond in a united manner if the threats were confirmed [7][8]. Group 3: Responses from Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands - Germany's government spokesperson noted awareness of Trump's comments and mentioned consultations with European partners to decide on appropriate responses [10]. - UK Prime Minister Starmer criticized the tariff threats as completely wrong and emphasized that the future of Greenland should be determined by its people and Denmark [12]. - The Netherlands' Foreign Minister stated that they are in close contact with EU partners to discuss response measures [14]. Group 4: Responses from Finland and the EU - Finland's President Stubb advocated for resolving issues through dialogue rather than pressure, warning that tariffs could harm transatlantic relations [16]. - The EU leadership expressed that the tariffs would damage transatlantic relations and could lead to a dangerous cycle, reaffirming solidarity with Denmark and Greenland [18].
格陵兰岛自治政府:任何情况下都不接受美国吞并意图
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2026-01-12 23:24
Core Viewpoint - The Greenlandic government firmly rejects any intentions from the United States to annex Greenland, emphasizing that it will not accept such actions under any circumstances [1][3]. Group 1: Greenland's Defense and Autonomy - The Greenlandic government is currently engaging in discussions with six NATO countries regarding defense issues related to Greenland [3]. - The government plans to enhance its defense efforts under NATO's leadership, highlighting the positive statements made by the six NATO member countries [3]. - Greenland will continue to collaborate with Denmark to ensure that its defense dialogue and development occur within the NATO framework, affirming its commitment to being part of the Western defense alliance [3]. Group 2: U.S. Intentions and Reactions - Since taking office in early 2025, U.S. President Trump has repeatedly expressed a desire for the U.S. to acquire Greenland, suggesting the possibility of using force if necessary [3]. - Recent comments from U.S. officials indicate a continued push to discuss the acquisition of Greenland, raising concerns among some NATO members and European countries [3]. - Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark, with significant autonomy, while defense and foreign affairs are managed by the Danish government [3].
丹麦与英国领导人:格陵兰岛未来应由自身和丹麦决定
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-05 22:50
Core Viewpoint - The Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has condemned U.S. President Trump's repeated suggestions that Greenland could become part of the U.S., labeling it as "unacceptable pressure" from the U.S. on Denmark [2] Group 1: Political Stance - Denmark has been a strong ally of the U.S., and any military action by the U.S. against NATO allies would be seen as a violation of NATO treaties [2] - Frederiksen emphasized her commitment to defending democratic values and the right of Greenlanders to determine their own future, indicating that Greenland has expressed a desire not to become part of the U.S. [2] Group 2: International Relations - The British Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated that only Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark should decide the future of Greenland, reinforcing Denmark's position as a close ally in Europe and within NATO [2] - The ongoing discussions highlight the geopolitical significance of Greenland, the world's largest island, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark [2]
格陵兰岛总理回应特朗普:够了,不要再施压,不要再旁敲侧击,不要再幻想吞并
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-05 11:30
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the Prime Minister of Greenland, Jens Frederik Nielsen, has rejected recent U.S. statements regarding the control and annexation of Greenland, calling them "completely unacceptable" [1][3] - Nielsen emphasized that threats and discussions of annexation should not occur between friends, indicating a desire for dialogue through proper channels and respect for international law [3] - U.S. President Trump has linked Greenland to military interventions and stated that "we absolutely need Greenland," which Nielsen and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen have both criticized, asserting that the U.S. has no right to annex Greenland [3]
特朗普“十分想要”格陵兰岛,丹麦女首相:完全没有道理
第一财经· 2026-01-05 03:58
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the tensions between Denmark and the United States regarding President Trump's comments on the strategic importance of Greenland and the notion of the U.S. potentially acquiring the territory, which Denmark firmly opposes [1][2]. Group 1: Denmark's Response - Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen emphasized that the U.S. has no right to annex Greenland and called for the cessation of threats against Denmark and Greenland's people [1]. - Frederiksen highlighted that existing defense agreements allow the U.S. significant access to Greenland, and Denmark is increasing its investment in Arctic security [1]. - She firmly stated that Greenland is not for sale, reinforcing Denmark's sovereignty over the territory [1]. Group 2: U.S. Position - President Trump reiterated the U.S. need for Greenland, citing its strategic location in the Arctic as beneficial for national security [1]. - Trump appointed Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as the U.S. envoy to Greenland, emphasizing the importance of the island to U.S. national security interests [1]. - Landry's comments about making Greenland "part of America" have drawn criticism from the EU, Norway, Denmark, and Greenland [1]. Group 3: Greenland's Status - Greenland is the world's largest island and is an autonomous territory of Denmark, with Denmark managing its defense and foreign affairs [2]. - The U.S. currently operates a military base in Greenland, which has been a point of contention amid Trump's repeated assertions about acquiring the island [2].
丹麦:对特朗普任命格陵兰岛特使“强烈不满”
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-12-22 23:02
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is the appointment of Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as the U.S. Special Envoy to Greenland, emphasizing the strategic importance of Greenland for U.S. national security [1] - Jeff Landry, a strong supporter of Trump, will serve in this voluntary role while also fulfilling his duties as governor, indicating a dual commitment to both positions [1] - Greenland, the world's largest island, is a self-governing territory of Denmark, with significant U.S. military presence, particularly the Thule Air Base, which is crucial for missile defense and space monitoring [1] Group 2 - Denmark's Foreign Minister expressed strong dissatisfaction with the U.S. appointment of a Greenland envoy, highlighting concerns over territorial integrity and the principle that no country should annex another [2] - A joint statement from the Danish Prime Minister and the Greenlandic government reiterated that Greenland belongs to its people and should not be claimed by the U.S. [2]
外交部回应日方将在与中国台湾邻近的西南诸岛部署进攻性武器
证券时报· 2025-11-24 07:56
Group 1 - The article highlights that recent statements by Japanese leaders regarding Taiwan have damaged the foundation and atmosphere for China-Japan-South Korea cooperation, making it currently unsuitable to hold a trilateral leaders' meeting [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, expressed that Japan's deployment of offensive weapons near Taiwan is a deliberate attempt to create regional tension and provoke military confrontation, linking it to erroneous remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida [1] - The Chinese government asserts its determination and capability to defend national territorial sovereignty against any resurgence of Japanese militarism and external interference in Taiwan [1]