Workflow
场景化保险销售
icon
Search documents
一个订单三荐保险、折叠免责条款,旅行平台防不胜防的保险搭售陷阱
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-05-20 07:11
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of consumers being unknowingly charged for insurance during the ticket purchasing process on travel platforms, raising concerns about transparency and consumer rights [1][10][21]. Group 1: Consumer Experience - A consumer named Zhang Xian encountered unexpected insurance charges amounting to 204 yuan when purchasing train tickets, which were not clearly disclosed during the transaction process [1][2]. - The insurance was identified as "Trip Delay Allowance Insurance," underwritten by Huatai Insurance [2][4]. - Zhang, despite being knowledgeable about insurance, felt trapped by the platform's sales tactics, indicating a lack of clarity in the purchasing process [4][10]. Group 2: Insurance Sales Process - The ticket purchasing process included multiple points where insurance options were presented, but the final insurance offer was less visible and misleadingly labeled [5][7]. - The design of the insurance sales interface exploited consumers' urgency to purchase tickets, making it easy to overlook critical information [8][14]. - Legal experts argue that such practices infringe on consumers' rights to be informed and to make fair choices [10][14]. Group 3: Regulatory Compliance - The article discusses the lack of compliance with regulations that require clear disclosure of insurance terms and conditions during the sales process [11][21]. - It notes that the insurance sales interface failed to meet the standards set by previous regulatory guidelines, which have since been repealed [17][21]. - Experts emphasize the need for platforms to ensure that essential information is not hidden and that consumers are adequately informed before making a purchase [20][21]. Group 4: Insurance Product Suitability - Concerns were raised about the appropriateness of the insurance product itself, as it included coverage for scenarios that did not match the consumer's travel plans [15][17]. - The insurance policy contained various coverage options, but many were irrelevant to Zhang's situation, leading to questions about the necessity and value of the product [15][17]. - Legal experts suggest that consumers should be able to understand the relevance of insurance products to their specific needs to avoid unnecessary expenses [20][21].