Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights that the Trump administration's tariff policies are a significant aspect of its governance, and these policies are likely to continue evolving during its "2.0 phase" [1] - Most economies lack the capability to maintain a "terrifying balance" with the United States, indicating that the threat of tariffs will persist without the announcement of "reciprocal tariffs" [1] - Experts in international law and trade suggest that risks should be mitigated in three areas: increased vertical industry investigations from the U.S., potential "anti-dumping" investigations from other countries affecting Chinese foreign trade enterprises, and unexpected additional tariffs such as secondary sanctions and punitive tariffs [1] Group 2 - A tax expert noted the current confusion surrounding U.S. tariff classifications, leading to uncertainty among foreign trade companies regarding how to report taxes on various product categories [1] - For instance, companies exporting steel furniture are unclear whether they will face tariffs on steel and aluminum first, followed by furniture tariffs, raising questions about the overall calculation of these tariffs [1]