据西安城乡融合要素交易市场相关负责人介绍，此次社会化服务功能的上线，将进一步推动城市技 术、资本、人才等优质资源下沉乡村，促进农村土地、农产品等资源价值变现，平台将持续优化服务功 能、丰富服务内容，加强与科研机构、金融机构的合作，不断提升服务精准度与实效性，有效促进城乡 要素双向流动，为乡村产业发展持续注入动力。 记者了解到，上述功能依托平台已建成"市-区县-街镇-村"四级服务网络，构建"需求发布-资源匹配- 履约监管"闭环机制，推出分层分类服务：为小农户提供"菜单式"基础服务包，为村集体定制资产盘活 专项服务，为新型农业经营主体提供集约化集成服务，破解农业服务"信息散、对接难"问题。 此次上线的服务功能涵盖六大板块，其中，政策咨询板块提供"一对一"政策解读与申报指导；技术 服务板块开通专家在线问诊、田间指导服务；农机劳务板块助力设备与人力供需精准匹配；农资采购板 块以集采降本并保障质量；金融保险板块推出26类定制产品降低风险；市场品牌板块促进产销对接与品 牌打造。 1月9日，记者从西安城乡融合要素交易市场获悉，经过近半年的周密筹备与调试优化，西安城乡融 合要素交易市场社会化服务功能于近日上线，以"线上+线下 ...

党的二十届四中全会审议通过的"十五五"规划建议中强调坚持把解决好"三农"问题作为全党工作重中之 重，促进城乡融合发展，为"三农"工作锚定了新方向。当前，我国城乡发展不平衡和二元经济结构特征 仍然明显。从发展规律看，我国已经跨过"刘易斯第一拐点"，但要推动城乡真正融合和乡村全面振兴， 有待新的发展。 想要推动乡村全面振兴，就要优先发展乡村的教育事业。对乡村而言，优先发展教育，不但可以带来先 进技术，提高智慧水平，还能打造文明乡风，为乡村建设提供人才支撑，因此其具有不可替代的基础性 作用。优先发展乡村教育事业，无疑是推动乡村全面振兴的重要支点。 我国具有特殊的国情农情，区域广、地区差异大，这一特征在一定时期内客观存在，为保障粮食安全， 农业部门仍需维持一定规模的劳动力，以我省来说，小规模农业区也广泛存在。在推进城乡融合发展过 程中，既要遵循城镇化进程中的共性规律，也要充分重视省域农情的特殊性与复杂性。目前，要抢抓破 除城乡二元结构、健全城乡融合发展体制机制的"窗口期"机遇，统筹新型工业化、新型城镇化和乡村全 面振兴，以产聚人、以人兴业、以城带乡，多措并举增强城乡融合发展的内生动力。 推动城乡要素双向流动。"十五五 ...

党的二十届四中全会提出"推动城乡要素双向流动，激励各类人才下乡服务和创业就业"。近年来，城乡 要素改革深入推进，城乡之间要素流动出现新趋势，从以往由乡到城的单向流动为主转变为城乡要素双 向流动，对促进城乡融合发展具有重要意义。 "十四五"以来，我国全面深化户籍制度改革，加快破除人口进城的户籍障碍，城镇化率提升了3.1个百 分点，4100多万人口实现从乡村到城镇的迁移，提前两年完成预期目标。深入推进全域土地综合整治， 深化农村集体经营性建设用地入市试点，稳妥推进农村宅基地制度改革试点，促进城乡之间土地要素流 动的改革试点加快落地。财政金融等资金更多投向农业农村，中央财政衔接推进乡村振兴补助资金预计 达到8000多亿元，涉农贷款余额超50万亿元。建成了较为完备的农业科技创新体系，农业科技进步贡献 率超过63%，农作物耕种收综合机械化率达74%，农作物良种覆盖率达96%以上，农业科技创新整体迈 入世界第一方阵。 "十五五"时期，我们要深入贯彻落实党的二十届四中全会的战略部署，健全推动城乡要素双向流动的长 效机制，促进城乡融合发展，推动农业农村现代化建设。 畅通城乡之间人口双向流动的通道。加快完善农业转移人口市民化体 ...

Core Viewpoint - The decision made by the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party emphasizes the importance of promoting equal exchange and two-way flow of urban and rural factors to reduce urban-rural disparities and foster common prosperity [1] Group 1: Urban-Rural Integration Achievements - Since the 18th National Congress, significant progress has been made in urban-rural integration, with the urbanization rate of the resident population increasing from 53.73% in 2013 to 67.00% in 2024 [1] - The income ratio between urban and rural residents has decreased from 2.81 in 2013 to 2.34 in 2024, indicating a narrowing income gap [1] Group 2: Challenges in Factor Flow - There are institutional barriers hindering the efficient flow of land, labor, and capital between urban and rural areas, affecting resource optimization and mutual development [2][3] - The dual characteristics of the urban-rural land market highlight the need for improved land resource allocation and efficiency, as well as the activation of "sleeping" land resources in rural areas [2] Group 3: Labor Mobility Issues - The free flow of labor between urban and rural areas is constrained by the household registration system and insufficient public service coverage, which limits the urbanization of agricultural migrants [2] - Rural areas face challenges such as aging populations and hollow villages, which hinder high-quality rural development [2] Group 4: Capital Flow Challenges - Capital flow between urban and rural areas is predominantly one-way, with rural areas experiencing difficulties in financing due to unique land ownership issues and an underdeveloped transaction market [3] - Despite government encouragement for capital to flow into rural areas, the effects have not been fully realized due to regulatory shortcomings [3] Group 5: Proposed Solutions - Recommendations include clarifying land ownership, establishing transaction platforms, and ensuring shared benefits from land value increases to activate dormant land resources [4] - Strengthening incentives and support for talent mobility, including improving the urbanization process for agricultural migrants and enhancing support for rural entrepreneurship [5] - Coordinating the roles of fiscal funds, financial capital, and social capital to attract investment in rural development projects and improve financing capabilities for agricultural entities [5]