Core Insights - The article highlights the contrasting performance of two fund managers at Dongwu Fund, Zhao Meiling and Liu Yuanhai, illustrating the harsh realities of the asset management industry [2][10]. Group 1: Zhao Meiling's Performance - Zhao Meiling manages several funds, including Dongwu Industry Rotation Mixed A/C and Dongwu Progress Strategy A/C, which are among the bottom ten in terms of performance over the past year, with declines of 5.47% and 5.45% respectively [2]. - As of January 9, 2026, Zhao Meiling has managed 23 funds, with 20 showing negative returns, resulting in a loss rate of 87% [5]. - Her longest-managed fund, Dongwu Progress Strategy Mixed A, has a return of 18.36% over nearly 8 years, significantly below the average of 85.52% for similar funds, ranking near the bottom 10% [6][14]. Group 2: Liu Yuanhai's Performance - In contrast, Liu Yuanhai, the Chief Investment Officer at Dongwu Fund, has achieved positive returns across most of his managed funds, with 14 out of 18 showing positive performance [10][13]. - Liu's flagship fund, Dongwu New Trend Value Line Mixed, has delivered a remarkable return of 612.86% over nearly 7 years, far exceeding the average of 90.82% for similar funds, ranking first among 2466 peers [14]. - Liu's funds have generated substantial profits, with a cumulative net gain of 311 million yuan over the past four and a half years [14]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The contrasting fortunes of Zhao Meiling and Liu Yuanhai raise questions about the reliance on individual fund managers in the asset management industry, suggesting that investors may be betting on "superstars" rather than the fund companies themselves [10][14]. - The phenomenon of funds making money while individual investors do not is increasingly evident, highlighting the need for effective strategies that translate into real returns for investors [3][10].

Core Insights - The phenomenon of "funds making money while investors do not" is prevalent in both domestic and international markets, indicating a significant issue of return erosion [2][3][4] Group 1: Fund Industry Overview - As of July 2025, the net asset value of public funds in China reached 35.08 trillion yuan, while the scale of existing private funds hit 20.68 trillion yuan, both marking historical highs [1] - The issue of "funds making money while investors do not" has negatively impacted investor satisfaction and the reputation of the industry [2][4] Group 2: Causes of Return Erosion - Return erosion is fundamentally due to the significant gap between time-weighted returns and capital-weighted returns, with the former reflecting the fund's performance since inception and the latter influenced by investor behavior [4] - Two main factors contribute to return erosion: mismatched timing between fund management scale and investment capability, and poor investment timing or investor behavior, particularly during market peaks [4][5] Group 3: Solutions and Best Practices - Fund managers are ultimately responsible for addressing return erosion, and establishing independent institutions to oversee and reflect issues is crucial [6] - Implementing annual subscription limits to control growth rates and ensuring that new investors' returns align with earlier time-weighted returns is recommended [6][8] - Enhancing transparency by disclosing key performance metrics such as time-weighted returns and capital-weighted returns is essential for building investor trust [9] Group 4: Company Strategy - The company emphasizes the importance of prioritizing investor interests over rapid scale expansion, aligning internal values across departments to ensure sustainable growth [8][9] - The company recognizes the need for a balanced approach to scale growth and long-term development, focusing on delivering sustainable returns to investors [9]

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "funds making money while investors do not" is primarily due to yield erosion, which highlights the significant gap between time-weighted returns and capital-weighted returns [1][3][4] Group 1: Fund Industry Overview - As of July 2025, the net asset value of public funds in China reached 35.08 trillion yuan, while the scale of existing private funds hit 20.68 trillion yuan, both marking historical highs [1] - The issue of "funds making money while investors do not" has been increasingly prominent, damaging investor sentiment and the industry's reputation [2][3] Group 2: Causes of Yield Erosion - Yield erosion arises from two main factors: a mismatch between fund management scale and investment capability, and inappropriate investment timing or investor behavior, particularly during market peaks [4][5] - A significant disparity between time-weighted returns and capital-weighted returns can lead to substantial risks for investors and damage the reputation of fund managers [4][5] Group 3: Responsibilities and Solutions - Fund managers are identified as the ultimate responsible parties for addressing yield erosion, and independent institutions should be established to protect investor interests and monitor fund managers [5][6] - Strategies to eliminate yield erosion include setting annual subscription limits to control growth rates and ensuring that new investors' returns align with earlier time-weighted returns [5][6] Group 4: Company Practices and Future Directions - The company emphasizes the importance of integrating investment capability with sound business practices, prioritizing investor interests over mere fund performance [2][7] - To manage rapid growth, the company plans to unify its departments under a value-driven culture, enhance transparency of key performance metrics, and implement systematic data analysis to monitor and manage yield erosion [7]