外交底线
Search documents
伤害性不大,侮辱性极强
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-23 23:46
(一) 伤害性不大,侮辱性极强。 这是我看到这张图的第一感觉,真是哭笑不得。军国大事,但有时,也就像是小孩子过家家。 事情的起因,是米兰冬奥会男子冰球决赛,美国队2:1险胜加拿大队,时隔46年再夺得冬奥会该项目金牌。 一个第一,一个第二,都是世界强队,都值得祝贺。 哪知道,白宫突然贴出一张图,图中,凶悍的白头鹰猛扑加拿大鹅,可怜的大鹅,被踩在脚底。 白宫是回应一年前特鲁多的一句话:"你们夺不走我们的国家——也夺不走我们的国球。" 这不是羞辱是什么? 一年过去了,特鲁多早已不是加拿大总理,但白宫还念念不忘,以这种方式公开进行羞辱。 要知道,这不是某个美国官员的帖子,而是白宫的官方账号。 试想一下,如果中国队战胜美国队,如果某个中国官方账号这样发,绝对是严重报道安全事故,从总编到小编,肯定一撸一个准。 中国绝对不会做的事情,但美国就是美国,美国就很任性。 加拿大队拿到银牌后,加拿大总理卡尼表示祝贺,说:祝贺你们在这场艰苦比赛中拿到银牌,你们让整个国家为此骄傲。 很正常的表述,但不正常的,是美国议员兰迪·芬恩的转发:祝贺,州长! 人家好歹是加拿大总理,现在成了美国人的州长! (二) 这还没完。 特朗普自己的账号,还 ...
美国持续输出,直接给莫迪强安罪名?事到如今,不是中国不肯拉一把
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-01 10:47
Group 1 - The U.S. has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, which is seen as a direct pressure tactic against India, particularly in light of its purchase of Russian oil [3][4] - Navarro's comments linking India's oil purchases to the funding of the Ukraine conflict suggest a strategic narrative aimed at framing India as a "betrayer" of democratic values [3][4] - The U.S. is using India as a target to shift blame for its own strategic failures, particularly in relation to inflation and supply chain issues [6] Group 2 - The U.S. strategy towards India includes economic measures such as tariffs and investment restrictions, which are perceived as low-cost actions with immediate effects [6] - The U.S. aims to test India's diplomatic boundaries and potentially influence its stance on Russia, while also preparing for future adjustments in its position regarding the Ukraine conflict [6][10] - Modi's upcoming visit to China is seen as a potential opportunity for India to seek support against U.S. pressure, although India's response remains ambiguous [8][10]