商家需守好品质底线，平台应回归服务本质，消费者更要理性下单，不盲目为凑单多买一份，不因优惠浪 费一口。唯有三方合力，才能让外卖经济真正行稳致远，让"舌尖上的美味"不再变成"指尖上的浪费"。 这种促销看似"多赢"，实则已陷入恶性循环。平台靠补贴抢流量，却将成本变相转嫁商家；部分商家利润 空间被压缩，通过悄悄缩减食材分量、用临期原料，甚至虚增打包费等方式维持运营；消费者看似占了便 宜，却常为不需要的餐食买单，还可能面临"货不对板""食材不新鲜"等食品安全风险。最终，浪费的是粮 食，损害的是商家的信誉，消耗的是消费者对平台和商家的信任。 近日，市场监管总局组织起草的《外卖平台服务管理基本要求（征求意见稿）》公开征求意见，直指平 台"裹挟式"竞争与过度"价格战"，这为外卖行业划定了健康发展的底线，也有利于遏制食品浪费。 "0元奶茶""满50减30"……一段时间来，各大外卖平台上"满减"促销活动层出不穷，看似是消费者"薅羊 毛"的狂欢，实则是一场被"优惠"裹挟的浪费陷阱。 为了凑够满减额度，不少人会选择多点一份主食、加一道小菜，吃不完的餐食则被直接扔进垃圾桶；订单 暴涨时，配送瘫痪导致餐品超时变质，最终也只能沦为垃圾… ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of excessive food waste caused by promotional activities like "full reduction" discounts on food delivery platforms, which create a false sense of savings for consumers while leading to negative consequences for businesses and the environment [2][3]. Group 1: Impact on Consumers - Consumers often order more food than needed to meet discount thresholds, resulting in uneaten meals being discarded [2]. - The rush in order volumes can lead to delivery delays, causing food to spoil and ultimately be wasted [2]. Group 2: Impact on Businesses - Delivery platforms rely on subsidies to attract users, which indirectly shifts costs to merchants, squeezing their profit margins [3]. - Some merchants respond by reducing ingredient quality, using near-expiry products, or inflating packaging fees to maintain operations [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The State Administration for Market Regulation has drafted guidelines aimed at addressing "coercive" competition and excessive price wars in the food delivery industry, promoting healthier development standards [3]. - The guidelines encourage merchants to maintain quality, platforms to focus on service, and consumers to make rational purchasing decisions to reduce waste [3].