多边主义与全球化
Search documents
前雀巢CEO兼董事长包必达:董事会一次都没征询过我意见,食品工业世纪范式早已到头
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-29 23:15
来源:小食代 原标题:前雀巢CEO兼董事长包必达:董事会一次都没征询过我意见,食品工业世纪范式早已到头,创 始人在位时接班问题总是棘手的 "许多高管真以为自己有权势,直到退休才发现,随着职位而去的还有权力。"前雀巢集团首席执行官兼 董事长包必达(Peter Brabeck-Letmathe)说。 罪魁祸首 问:包必达先生,您想从哪开始我们的对话? 答:世界是更紧迫的话题。今天我们所经历的,是旧有基于规则的国际秩序的崩溃。过去三四十年间, 我们拥有一个明确规则的国际体系。这套体系创造了巨大繁荣:数十亿人摆脱极端贫困,迈入新兴中产 阶层。这是多边主义与全球化的成果。但如今,这一秩序正在瓦解。 问:瑞士正面临哪些优势丧失的风险? 答:瑞士的成功传统上建立在三大支柱之上:中立、自由主义与稳定。这个国家从不具威胁性,而是充 当桥梁建设者。经济上,它曾是全球最自由开放的经济体之一,对跨国企业极具吸引力。遗憾的是,近 年来我们失去了许多这样的优势。 问:能否举个具体例子? 日前,包必达接受了瑞士媒体《新苏黎世报》(Neue Zürcher Zeitung)的专访。据该报说,这位81岁的 老人在几周前曾出人意料地放弃雀巢"名 ...
澳大利亚智库:中国是东南亚国家最具影响力的伙伴
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-09-25 22:38
Group 1 - The core finding of the report indicates that China has slightly surpassed the United States to become the most influential partner in Southeast Asia, with predictions that the gap may widen as the current U.S. administration's policies take effect in the region [1][2] - The 2025 Southeast Asia Influence Index evaluates the relative power of external forces, including the U.S., China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, the UK, and Russia, in Southeast Asia, showing China's dominance in countries like Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Brunei, Malaysia, and Indonesia [1][2] - The report highlights that China is the largest export market for Southeast Asia, accounting for approximately 26% of the region's imports, and is becoming an increasingly important source of private investment [2] Group 2 - The report notes that while China leads in economic relations and overall diplomatic influence, it lags behind the U.S. in cultural influence and defense presence in Southeast Asia [2] - Factors contributing to the widening influence gap between China and the U.S. include the rise of emerging countries, the U.S.'s ambiguous policies towards Southeast Asia, and growing divergences on various global issues [2][3] - The analysis suggests that the Southeast Asian nations are increasingly aligning with China's development philosophy and needs, contrasting with the U.S.'s recent protectionist measures and high tariffs [2]