Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the potential new policy in Shanghai that may offer free green licenses for hybrid vehicles with an electric range exceeding 400 kilometers, indicating a possible shift from the current policy that only benefits pure electric vehicles [1][2] - There are concerns that this policy may favor local car manufacturers, raising suspicions of local protectionism, which contradicts the goal of building a unified national market [1][2] - The market currently has few hybrid models that meet the 400-kilometer electric range, with the Zhiji LS6 range extender being a notable local product [1][2] Group 2 - The implementation of such a policy could lead to market segmentation and negative impacts, as it may force car manufacturers to increase vehicle costs significantly to meet the new requirements, potentially raising prices in the Shanghai market compared to other regions [2] - If other cities adopt similar policies, it could create a chain reaction of "policy barriers," reminiscent of past issues with local subsidies that fragmented the market and hindered the development of the electric vehicle industry [2] - The trend towards hybrid models with a "large battery + small fuel tank" configuration is gaining traction, aligning with consumer needs, and the policy could accelerate this development [3] Group 3 - There is a risk that car manufacturers may focus on increasing battery capacity rather than genuine technological innovation in response to the policy, as evidenced by reports of companies adjusting their plans to meet the new electric range requirements [3] - The goal of building a unified national market is to eliminate regional barriers and promote the free flow of resources, which is essential for innovation and market prosperity [3] - Public policies should encourage diverse technological competition and innovation to meet varied consumer demands, rather than creating divisions in the market [3]