2026年1月26日，最高人民法院举行新闻发布会，发布人民法院以交叉执行为牵引，有效解决执行难工作情况。数据显 示，2025年新纳入失信名单233.98万人次，同时有266.96万人次通过信用修复回归市场，信用修复人次连续7个季度超过 新纳入失信名单人次。 最高法执行局局长黄文俊介绍，全国已累计有1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩戒压力主动履行义务。与此同时，最高法 联合最高人民检察院、公安部发布《关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件若干问题的意见》，严厉打击恶意规避执 行、逃避执行的拒执行为，去年追究拒不执行判决、裁定罪4461人，保持了对失信行为的高压态势。 失信名单人数在2024年和2025年已连续两年下降，原因是什么？是否意味着执行工作的强制力有所弱化？对此，最高法 执行局副局长邵长茂表示，失信被执行人名单制度，是有效解决"执行难"问题的重要举措。2025年，失信名单人数在 2024年首次下降的基础上再次下降，这是一个积极的、期待中的变化，是人民法院运用法治思维和系统观念推进社会治 理的生动实践。 邵长茂介绍，近年来，人民法院严把名单入口，坚持依法惩戒，严防泛化和滥用，严查仅为了提高执行强制性和威慑 力 ...

Core Viewpoint - The number of individuals newly added to the list of dishonest executors in China has decreased for the first time, with 2.457 million cases in 2024, a year-on-year decline of 23.4% [1][2] Group 1: Execution System and Credit Punishment - The Central Committee's proposal emphasizes improving the national execution system to effectively address the "execution difficulty" issue [1] - The Supreme Court has highlighted the importance of distinguishing between "dishonesty" and "inability" to pay, implementing targeted measures for each category [2][3] - The implementation of a grace period for credit punishment aims to enhance the precision of enforcement while supporting businesses with potential for recovery [4][5] Group 2: Case Studies and Practical Applications - A case involving a technology company illustrates the balance between enforcing creditor rights and allowing businesses to recover, leading to a successful resolution without adding the company to the dishonesty list [3][5] - Another case demonstrates how a company facing financial difficulties was able to secure funding through a credit repair certificate, allowing it to resume operations and repay debts [6][7] Group 3: Credit Repair Mechanisms - The courts are actively promoting credit repair mechanisms to help previously dishonest executors return to the market, with 1.972 million cases successfully repaired in the first three quarters of the year [8] - The establishment of a differentiated credit reward mechanism encourages debtors to fulfill their obligations, enhancing the overall business environment [7][8] Group 4: Enforcement and Punishment of Malicious Dishonesty - The Supreme Court has implemented 101 punitive measures against dishonest executors, with a significant number complying due to credit punishment pressure [11] - Ongoing issues with malicious dishonesty, such as evasion and resistance to execution, remain prevalent, prompting the need for stricter enforcement measures [10][11]