Core Viewpoint - The interactive game "The Queen's Game: The Prosperous World" has gained significant popularity but has faced backlash due to its historical inaccuracies and heavy focus on romantic narratives, leading to widespread criticism and the closure of comments across platforms [1][20]. Summary by Sections Game Overview - "The Queen's Game: The Prosperous World" is based on Wu Zetian, China's only female emperor, and incorporates elements of interactive storytelling and palace intrigue from the Tang Dynasty [2]. Controversy and Criticism - The game has been criticized for deviating from historical facts, particularly in its portrayal of romantic relationships that overshadow the main narrative of a female power figure's rise [3][6]. - The emotional narrative, especially the love story between the protagonist and the princes, has sparked debates about the representation of female empowerment [9][10]. Audience Reception - Players' reactions are polarized, with some appreciating the creative liberties taken in the game, while others argue that it undermines the significance of Wu Zetian as a symbol of female power [8][9]. - The competition between the two male leads, referred to as "95CP" and "45CP," has attracted a large female audience, indicating a preference for emotional engagement over historical accuracy [14][15][16]. Market Dynamics - The game reflects a broader trend in the female-oriented gaming market, where emotional narratives often take precedence over career-focused storylines, aligning with consumer preferences [12][19]. - The success of similar games suggests that emotional storytelling is a key driver in the female gaming segment, despite the potential for backlash when historical figures are involved [18][19]. Themes of Freedom and Choice - The narrative raises questions about the nature of freedom for women, particularly in the context of choosing between love and power, which has led to significant public discourse [21][22]. - The debate centers on whether sacrificing power for love represents true freedom or a regression in women's rights, highlighting the complexities of female empowerment in storytelling [24][25][27].