Core Viewpoint - The discussion at the Shanghai Two Sessions focuses on whether the "cold bench" of scientific research can be more stable, emphasizing the shift from tracking research to original innovation and breakthroughs [1] Group 1: Current Research Environment - The current research ecosystem has rigid age thresholds for talent evaluation, which may pressure researchers to pursue quick results rather than long-term projects [1][2] - The concept of "academic age," which measures research experience from the time of obtaining a doctoral degree, is proposed to better reflect a researcher's growth stage rather than their biological age [2] Group 2: Proposed Changes - The introduction of an academic age system aims to provide clear and stable development expectations for researchers at different stages, allowing for a more diverse evaluation system [2][3] - A dual qualification system is suggested, where both academic age and biological age criteria are considered, potentially expanding the age limit for eligibility [3] Group 3: Flexibility in Evaluation - The proposal includes a flexible recognition mechanism for academic age, allowing for deductions based on verified interruptions such as industry experience, military service, or parental leave [3] - The goal of the evaluation system is to alleviate anxiety among researchers and encourage them to engage in long-term research without the pressure of age-related constraints [3]

上海市政协委员、民进上海青工委主任、同济大学国豪书院副院长任捷建议引入学术年龄完善人才评价 体系，破解生理年龄带来科研焦虑。 上海市政协委员、民进上海青工委主任、同济大学国豪书院副院长任捷建议引入学术年龄完善人才评价 体系，破解生理年龄带来科研焦虑。 ...