Core Viewpoint - The National People's Congress Standing Committee is reviewing amendments to the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, focusing on the inclusion of provisions related to the protection of minors and the regulation of law enforcement practices [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative Changes - The third draft of the amendment includes provisions to regulate and strengthen mediation in public security cases, ensuring that facts are established and principles of legality, fairness, voluntariness, and timeliness are followed [4]. - The amendment aims to eliminate fines from the law and clarify that administrative detention should be handled by public security organs according to the law [4]. - It incorporates the organization and coercion of minors to engage in inappropriate activities, such as paid companionship in unsuitable venues, into the scope of public security management punishments [4][9]. Group 2: Law Enforcement and Procedural Improvements - The amendment seeks to enhance law enforcement by specifying the identification of police officers and improving procedures for evidence collection, including mandatory recording of on-site seizures [4]. - It establishes clearer guidelines for handling cases involving minors, including provisions for hearings and the presence of guardians or representatives during questioning [8]. Group 3: Focus on Minors - The amendment addresses the rising trend of juvenile delinquency by adjusting penalties for minors aged 14-18 who commit serious offenses, allowing for administrative detention under specific circumstances [7]. - It emphasizes the need for coordination with the Law on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency, mandating educational and corrective measures for minors who cannot be punished due to age [8]. - The law also includes measures to combat bullying in schools, holding schools accountable for failing to report or address severe bullying incidents [8].

Core Viewpoint - The event "Sending a Beam of Legal Light to Children" aims to enhance legal awareness among minors, focusing on issues like school bullying and the role of law in protecting their rights [1][37]. Group 1: Event Overview - The event was co-hosted by the Supreme People's Court and other judicial bodies, featuring a live performance and discussions on legal education for minors [1][19]. - The event included a drama performance by students that depicted the consequences of bullying, aiming to provoke thought and discussion among peers [7][9]. Group 2: Legal Education and Awareness - The vice principal of legal affairs at Beijing University Affiliated High School, Wang Haihong, provided insights into identifying and addressing bullying, emphasizing its psychological impacts [11][12]. - Wang Haihong explained the four common forms of bullying: physical, verbal, social isolation, and cyberbullying, helping students understand the issue more clearly [11][12]. Group 3: Judicial Guidance and Case Studies - The Supreme People's Court released six typical cases related to school management disputes, highlighting the importance of legal frameworks in educational settings [20][21]. - The event served as a platform for discussing the responsibilities of schools in managing student behavior and ensuring a safe environment [20][21]. Group 4: Interactive Q&A Session - During the Q&A session, students and parents raised questions about school responsibilities and legal implications of various scenarios, demonstrating active engagement with the topic [23][27]. - The discussion included real-life examples and legal consequences of actions like "opening boxes and hanging people," emphasizing the importance of understanding personal rights and responsibilities [27][28]. Group 5: Community and Parental Involvement - The event highlighted the need for collaboration between families, schools, and the judicial system to foster a supportive environment for minors [37]. - Participants expressed a desire for more interactive legal education formats, such as debates and immersive activities, to enhance understanding and engagement with legal concepts [36][37].