Core Viewpoint - The South Korean President Lee Jae-myung stated that South Korea cannot continue the "security relies on the U.S., economy relies on China" approach, which has garnered significant attention [1] Group 1: China-South Korea Relations - A healthy, stable, and continuously deepening China-South Korea relationship aligns with the fundamental interests of both nations and contributes to regional and global peace, stability, and prosperity [1] - The development of China-South Korea relations is based on mutual interests and should not be influenced by third-party factors [1] - China maintains a consistent and stable policy towards South Korea and hopes for mutual efforts to promote the sustainable and healthy development of the China-South Korea strategic partnership [1]

Group 1: Meeting Overview - The meeting between US President Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung lasted approximately 140 minutes, including a 54-minute public session and a closed-door discussion [3][5] - The discussions covered various topics, including relations with North Korea, shipbuilding cooperation, and US-South Korea relations, with both leaders appearing to set a positive tone [1][6] - Despite the positive atmosphere, no joint statement or significant outcomes were announced, indicating unresolved issues in trade and security [1][6] Group 2: Key Issues Raised - Trump expressed a desire for South Korea to transfer ownership of some US military base lands, which has raised concerns in Seoul about potential implications for US-South Korea relations [3][6] - The meeting also touched on the renegotiation of the US-South Korea trade agreement, with Trump indicating openness to discussions but not guaranteeing any concessions [4][6] - Lee's comments about potential investments, such as the purchase of over 100 Boeing aircraft by Korean Air, highlight efforts to strengthen economic ties during the visit [4] Group 3: Domestic Reactions - The largest opposition party in South Korea criticized Lee's performance during the meeting, labeling it as "diplomatic disaster" and suggesting he was overly accommodating [5][6] - Observers noted that while the meeting appeared friendly, future negotiations on trade and security could be fraught with tension [6][7] - Lee's statements regarding a shift away from the "America-centric" approach in favor of a more balanced relationship with China have sparked debate about the feasibility of such a strategy [7][8]