Group 1: Core Views - The document emphasizes the importance of strict and fair judicial practices to ensure high-quality development and security, focusing on financial and intellectual property trials, as well as improving the legal business environment and safeguarding people's livelihoods [1][2]. Group 2: Financial Judicial Work - The document calls for severe punishment for financial crimes such as market manipulation, insider trading, illegal fundraising, loan fraud, and money laundering, while promoting healthy development in financial markets [1]. - It highlights the need to establish rules for handling disputes in emerging financial areas like digital currency, mobile payments, and cross-border asset transactions [1]. Group 3: Intellectual Property Judicial Work - The document stresses the need for enhanced judicial protection of technological innovation and trade secrets in key frontier areas [1]. - It aims to improve the appellate review mechanism for intellectual property cases and strengthen the connection between administrative enforcement and judicial trials in this field [1]. Group 4: Legal Business Environment - The document outlines the need to punish various economic crimes and corruption to maintain the socialist market economy order [2]. - It emphasizes the importance of protecting property rights and preventing administrative and criminal interference in economic disputes [2]. - The document also calls for the establishment of punitive compensation systems in areas such as food safety, intellectual property, and environmental pollution [2]. Group 5: Livelihood Judicial Protection - The document proposes strengthening judicial protection in areas related to family, healthcare, elderly care, employment, and consumer rights to enhance public welfare [2]. - It aims to address medical malpractice disputes and promote harmonious doctor-patient relationships [2]. - The document also emphasizes the need to protect equal employment rights and timely compensation for migrant workers [2]. Group 6: Professional Judicial Team Building - The document highlights the importance of building a specialized judicial team and improving the training system for judges, particularly in financial, foreign-related, bankruptcy, intellectual property, and environmental resource areas [3].

Overall Requirements - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the judicial work in the new era, guided by Xi Jinping's thoughts and the principles of socialism with Chinese characteristics, aiming to enhance social fairness and justice while improving the judicial system [3][4]. Strengthening Party Leadership - The article stresses the need for the Party to maintain leadership over judicial work, ensuring that the Party's policies and decisions are effectively implemented within the judicial system [4][5]. - It highlights the importance of political education within the judiciary, reinforcing the understanding of the socialist judicial system and enhancing the confidence in it [4]. Ensuring Judicial Independence - The article calls for support for the judiciary to exercise its powers independently and fairly, with strict measures against any interference in judicial activities [5]. High-Quality Development and Security - The article outlines the necessity of maintaining national security and social stability through strict legal measures against serious crimes, including terrorism and organized crime [7]. - It emphasizes the importance of creating a law-based business environment by punishing economic crimes and protecting property rights [8]. Judicial Protection of Rights - The article discusses the need for enhanced judicial protection in various sectors, including intellectual property, environmental resources, and civil rights, to promote social welfare [9][10][12]. Reforming the Judicial System - The article advocates for deepening judicial reforms, including improving the judicial responsibility system and optimizing the evaluation of judicial quality and efficiency [14][16]. - It emphasizes the importance of judicial transparency and the need for a robust system for public access to judicial information [17]. Support for Judicial Work - The article highlights the importance of building a digital court system to enhance efficiency and accessibility in judicial processes [18]. - It calls for strengthening the judicial workforce through improved training and management systems for judges and court staff [19][20].