知识产权审判

Search documents
粤鲁两地联合培训提升知产审判业务质效
Ren Min Wang· 2025-09-05 01:02
此次培训班的举办,为粤鲁两省知识产权审判法官搭建了学习交流的平台,对提升两省知识产权审 判业务水平、加强知识产权司法保护力度、服务创新驱动发展战略具有积极的推动作用。来自广东法院 知识产权审判一线的干警,省公安厅、检察院、知识产权保护中心和广州市多元解纷中心四家单位的同 仁及山东、新疆、青海法院的知识产权审判一线干警共300余人参加培训。 来源:人民法院报 培训班邀请最高人民法院审判业务专家、全国知名专家学者和两省资深法官授课,课程紧密贴合当 前知识产权审判工作的实际需求,涵盖知识产权刑事案件问题探析、全省法院审判态势及难点热点问题 分析、典型案件分析等内容。同时,对违约救济的新发展、KTV案件审理有关问题解析、法律解释方 法、实用新型专利权、计算机软件著作权纠纷审判业务问题等进行了深入讲解。 本报讯(记者 吁青 通讯员 翁润东 唐潇)近日,广东、山东两省法院知识产权审判业务同步培训班 在两地法官学院顺利举办。此次培训班采取线上线下结合、跨省联训模式,以创新形式推动创新保障, 实现两省法院同行互学、优势互补、资源互鉴,力求实现教学相长、南北共进,推动新时代知产审判工 作迈向新高度。 ...
北京金融法院丁宇翔:金融领域创新发展迅速 司法审判应与行业发展同步
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-08-04 14:32
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality and efficient handling of financial cases, which are often linked to significant property interests of the parties involved [1][2] - The Beijing Financial Court has developed a new securities investment loss calculation model to address information asymmetry in securities fraud disputes, resulting in a resolution for over 260 investors [1][2] - The "Hundred Questions in Court" model has been implemented to systematically summarize details from numerous securities fraud cases, leading to clearer legal relationships and more precise judgments [2][3] Group 2 - The challenges in financial trials are increasingly characterized by the collective nature of cases, which complicates procedures and raises costs for parties involved [3] - A "dual-track dual-platform" mechanism has been explored to efficiently resolve collective financial disputes by allowing representative parties to express their demands and by providing model judgments for typical cases [3] - In internet trials, the application of complex technologies and the rapid evolution of new business models present significant challenges for judges, particularly in cases involving online misinformation and intellectual property [4][5]
《中共中央关于加强新时代审判工作的意见》发布 要求加强金融审判工作 依法严惩操纵市场、内幕交易等金融领域违法犯罪
Shang Hai Zheng Quan Bao· 2025-07-14 18:29
Group 1: Core Views - The document emphasizes the importance of strict and fair judicial practices to ensure high-quality development and security, focusing on financial and intellectual property trials, as well as improving the legal business environment and safeguarding people's livelihoods [1][2]. Group 2: Financial Judicial Work - The document calls for severe punishment for financial crimes such as market manipulation, insider trading, illegal fundraising, loan fraud, and money laundering, while promoting healthy development in financial markets [1]. - It highlights the need to establish rules for handling disputes in emerging financial areas like digital currency, mobile payments, and cross-border asset transactions [1]. Group 3: Intellectual Property Judicial Work - The document stresses the need for enhanced judicial protection of technological innovation and trade secrets in key frontier areas [1]. - It aims to improve the appellate review mechanism for intellectual property cases and strengthen the connection between administrative enforcement and judicial trials in this field [1]. Group 4: Legal Business Environment - The document outlines the need to punish various economic crimes and corruption to maintain the socialist market economy order [2]. - It emphasizes the importance of protecting property rights and preventing administrative and criminal interference in economic disputes [2]. - The document also calls for the establishment of punitive compensation systems in areas such as food safety, intellectual property, and environmental pollution [2]. Group 5: Livelihood Judicial Protection - The document proposes strengthening judicial protection in areas related to family, healthcare, elderly care, employment, and consumer rights to enhance public welfare [2]. - It aims to address medical malpractice disputes and promote harmonious doctor-patient relationships [2]. - The document also emphasizes the need to protect equal employment rights and timely compensation for migrant workers [2]. Group 6: Professional Judicial Team Building - The document highlights the importance of building a specialized judicial team and improving the training system for judges, particularly in financial, foreign-related, bankruptcy, intellectual property, and environmental resource areas [3].
中央发布!加强金融审判工作,促进金融市场健康发展!
证券时报· 2025-07-14 10:51
Overall Requirements - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the judicial work in the new era, guided by Xi Jinping's thoughts and the principles of socialism with Chinese characteristics, aiming to enhance social fairness and justice while improving the judicial system [3][4]. Strengthening Party Leadership - The article stresses the need for the Party to maintain leadership over judicial work, ensuring that the Party's policies and decisions are effectively implemented within the judicial system [4][5]. - It highlights the importance of political education within the judiciary, reinforcing the understanding of the socialist judicial system and enhancing the confidence in it [4]. Ensuring Judicial Independence - The article calls for support for the judiciary to exercise its powers independently and fairly, with strict measures against any interference in judicial activities [5]. High-Quality Development and Security - The article outlines the necessity of maintaining national security and social stability through strict legal measures against serious crimes, including terrorism and organized crime [7]. - It emphasizes the importance of creating a law-based business environment by punishing economic crimes and protecting property rights [8]. Judicial Protection of Rights - The article discusses the need for enhanced judicial protection in various sectors, including intellectual property, environmental resources, and civil rights, to promote social welfare [9][10][12]. Reforming the Judicial System - The article advocates for deepening judicial reforms, including improving the judicial responsibility system and optimizing the evaluation of judicial quality and efficiency [14][16]. - It emphasizes the importance of judicial transparency and the need for a robust system for public access to judicial information [17]. Support for Judicial Work - The article highlights the importance of building a digital court system to enhance efficiency and accessibility in judicial processes [18]. - It calls for strengthening the judicial workforce through improved training and management systems for judges and court staff [19][20].
中共中央:加大对关键前沿领域科技创新和商业秘密的司法保护力度
news flash· 2025-07-14 09:30
中共中央:加大对关键前沿领域科技创新和商业秘密的司法保护力度 智通财经7月14日电,《中共中央关于加强新时代审判工作的意见》提出,加强知识产权审判工作。加 大对关键前沿领域科技创新和商业秘密的司法保护力度。充分发挥知识产权审判职能作用,完善知识产 权案件上诉审理机制。健全知识产权领域行政执法和司法审判衔接机制,推动知识产权领域综合治理。 ...