10月14日，上海市第三中级人民法院（上海知识产权法院、上海铁路运输中级法院）召开《关于加强新时代知识产权审判工作 服务保障上海深化国际 科技创新中心建设的实施意见》（下称《实施意见》）暨典型案例新闻发布会，推出12项举措及8起典型案例，服务保障上海进一步深化国际科技创新中心 建设。 此外，为推动《实施意见》落地见效，上海三中院还同步推出健全知识产权审判制度机制、建设高水平专业审判队伍、强化数字技术赋能审判三大保 障。 发布会上，知识产权综合审判二庭庭长钱光文通报了8起典型案例，案例涉及集成电路、生物医药、数据权益等重点和新兴技术领域，为类案审判提供 了清晰裁判指引。 比如，行某信息科技（上海）有限公司（简称"行某公司"）运营"小某书"APP，供用户以图文记录生活，同时通过Robots协议、登录验证、IP访问频率 限制等技术措施，防范平台数据被非法获取。2020年3月至2023年2月期间，上海数某信息科技有限公司（简称"数某公司"）未经行某公司许可，开发"小某 书接口集合""小某书APP接口集合"两款产品，借助昆明秀某科技有限公司（简称"秀某公司"）的网站，有偿提供非法获取的"小某书"笔记作品及大量用户原 始 ...

此次培训班的举办，为粤鲁两省知识产权审判法官搭建了学习交流的平台，对提升两省知识产权审 判业务水平、加强知识产权司法保护力度、服务创新驱动发展战略具有积极的推动作用。来自广东法院 知识产权审判一线的干警，省公安厅、检察院、知识产权保护中心和广州市多元解纷中心四家单位的同 仁及山东、新疆、青海法院的知识产权审判一线干警共300余人参加培训。 来源：人民法院报 培训班邀请最高人民法院审判业务专家、全国知名专家学者和两省资深法官授课，课程紧密贴合当 前知识产权审判工作的实际需求，涵盖知识产权刑事案件问题探析、全省法院审判态势及难点热点问题 分析、典型案件分析等内容。同时，对违约救济的新发展、KTV案件审理有关问题解析、法律解释方 法、实用新型专利权、计算机软件著作权纠纷审判业务问题等进行了深入讲解。 本报讯（记者 吁青 通讯员 翁润东 唐潇）近日，广东、山东两省法院知识产权审判业务同步培训班 在两地法官学院顺利举办。此次培训班采取线上线下结合、跨省联训模式，以创新形式推动创新保障， 实现两省法院同行互学、优势互补、资源互鉴，力求实现教学相长、南北共进，推动新时代知产审判工 作迈向新高度。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality and efficient handling of financial cases, which are often linked to significant property interests of the parties involved [1][2] - The Beijing Financial Court has developed a new securities investment loss calculation model to address information asymmetry in securities fraud disputes, resulting in a resolution for over 260 investors [1][2] - The "Hundred Questions in Court" model has been implemented to systematically summarize details from numerous securities fraud cases, leading to clearer legal relationships and more precise judgments [2][3] Group 2 - The challenges in financial trials are increasingly characterized by the collective nature of cases, which complicates procedures and raises costs for parties involved [3] - A "dual-track dual-platform" mechanism has been explored to efficiently resolve collective financial disputes by allowing representative parties to express their demands and by providing model judgments for typical cases [3] - In internet trials, the application of complex technologies and the rapid evolution of new business models present significant challenges for judges, particularly in cases involving online misinformation and intellectual property [4][5]

Group 1: Core Views - The document emphasizes the importance of strict and fair judicial practices to ensure high-quality development and security, focusing on financial and intellectual property trials, as well as improving the legal business environment and safeguarding people's livelihoods [1][2]. Group 2: Financial Judicial Work - The document calls for severe punishment for financial crimes such as market manipulation, insider trading, illegal fundraising, loan fraud, and money laundering, while promoting healthy development in financial markets [1]. - It highlights the need to establish rules for handling disputes in emerging financial areas like digital currency, mobile payments, and cross-border asset transactions [1]. Group 3: Intellectual Property Judicial Work - The document stresses the need for enhanced judicial protection of technological innovation and trade secrets in key frontier areas [1]. - It aims to improve the appellate review mechanism for intellectual property cases and strengthen the connection between administrative enforcement and judicial trials in this field [1]. Group 4: Legal Business Environment - The document outlines the need to punish various economic crimes and corruption to maintain the socialist market economy order [2]. - It emphasizes the importance of protecting property rights and preventing administrative and criminal interference in economic disputes [2]. - The document also calls for the establishment of punitive compensation systems in areas such as food safety, intellectual property, and environmental pollution [2]. Group 5: Livelihood Judicial Protection - The document proposes strengthening judicial protection in areas related to family, healthcare, elderly care, employment, and consumer rights to enhance public welfare [2]. - It aims to address medical malpractice disputes and promote harmonious doctor-patient relationships [2]. - The document also emphasizes the need to protect equal employment rights and timely compensation for migrant workers [2]. Group 6: Professional Judicial Team Building - The document highlights the importance of building a specialized judicial team and improving the training system for judges, particularly in financial, foreign-related, bankruptcy, intellectual property, and environmental resource areas [3].

Overall Requirements - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the judicial work in the new era, guided by Xi Jinping's thoughts and the principles of socialism with Chinese characteristics, aiming to enhance social fairness and justice while improving the judicial system [3][4]. Strengthening Party Leadership - The article stresses the need for the Party to maintain leadership over judicial work, ensuring that the Party's policies and decisions are effectively implemented within the judicial system [4][5]. - It highlights the importance of political education within the judiciary, reinforcing the understanding of the socialist judicial system and enhancing the confidence in it [4]. Ensuring Judicial Independence - The article calls for support for the judiciary to exercise its powers independently and fairly, with strict measures against any interference in judicial activities [5]. High-Quality Development and Security - The article outlines the necessity of maintaining national security and social stability through strict legal measures against serious crimes, including terrorism and organized crime [7]. - It emphasizes the importance of creating a law-based business environment by punishing economic crimes and protecting property rights [8]. Judicial Protection of Rights - The article discusses the need for enhanced judicial protection in various sectors, including intellectual property, environmental resources, and civil rights, to promote social welfare [9][10][12]. Reforming the Judicial System - The article advocates for deepening judicial reforms, including improving the judicial responsibility system and optimizing the evaluation of judicial quality and efficiency [14][16]. - It emphasizes the importance of judicial transparency and the need for a robust system for public access to judicial information [17]. Support for Judicial Work - The article highlights the importance of building a digital court system to enhance efficiency and accessibility in judicial processes [18]. - It calls for strengthening the judicial workforce through improved training and management systems for judges and court staff [19][20].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to strengthen judicial protection for key frontier areas of technological innovation and trade secrets [1] - The Central Committee's opinion highlights the importance of enhancing intellectual property trial work [1] - It calls for the improvement of the appellate review mechanism for intellectual property cases [1] Group 2 - The document advocates for a better connection between administrative law enforcement and judicial trials in the field of intellectual property [1] - It aims to promote comprehensive governance in the intellectual property sector [1]