Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent collapse of the USDe stablecoin, highlighting the inherent risks and vulnerabilities associated with algorithmic stablecoins, particularly in volatile market conditions [2][3][15]. Group 1: USDe's Collapse - On October 11, 2023, USDe, the third-largest stablecoin, experienced a sudden drop from approximately $1 to $0.65 on Binance, leading to a significant loss of market value [2][6]. - The initial appeal of USDe was its promise of high yields, which attracted substantial investment, but this very feature contributed to its instability during market turbulence [4][5][10]. - The collapse was triggered by external market factors, including a significant drop in Bitcoin and Ethereum prices due to geopolitical tensions, resulting in a broader sell-off in the crypto market [11][12]. Group 2: Mechanism of USDe - USDe operates on a decentralized model, relying on collateralization with assets like ETH and utilizing derivatives for hedging, which theoretically maintains its peg to the dollar [9][10]. - The stability of USDe is contingent upon market liquidity and the effectiveness of its hedging mechanisms; however, during extreme market conditions, these mechanisms can fail, leading to significant price deviations [12][15]. - The incident primarily occurred on Binance, where high leverage and trading volume exacerbated the price drop, contrasting with other exchanges where USDe remained more stable [13][14]. Group 3: Broader Implications for Stablecoins - The event raises questions about the reliability of algorithmic stablecoins compared to traditional stablecoins like USDT and USDC, which are backed by fiat reserves [17][21]. - The article emphasizes that the concept of stablecoins is not new and has historical roots in systems like the gold standard, where trust in the backing asset was crucial for stability [18][20]. - Trust remains the fundamental element for the stability of any currency, including stablecoins, and the recent events highlight the fragility of this trust in the absence of robust backing [24][25].