Core Viewpoint - The recent issuance of the "Regulations on the Integrity of Rural Grassroots Cadres" emphasizes the prohibition of excessive and mechanical execution of policies, signaling a strong intent to address the issue of overburdening grassroots levels [1] Group 1 - The phenomenon of excessive task layering has been identified as a significant burden on grassroots cadres, leading to unrealistic expectations and pressures, such as requiring same-day feedback for tasks that should take a week [1] - The root causes of this excessive layering include performance anxiety among cadres, who seek to exceed reasonable policy goals, and a desire for safety margins, resulting in inflated expectations [1] - The detrimental effects of excessive layering include fatigue among grassroots cadres and counterproductive outcomes, as high standards are set without regard for actual capabilities [1] Group 2 - Effective implementation of tasks requires a focus on tangible results rather than mere formalities, advocating for a methodical approach that respects the realities faced by grassroots [2] - To curb excessive layering, establishing clear institutional constraints and responsibility lists is crucial, along with refining assessment mechanisms to incorporate genuine feedback from frontline workers [2] - The ongoing education on the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations aims to improve work styles and ensure that responsibilities are clearly defined and executed, fostering a collaborative environment for reform and development [2]