Workflow
层层加码
icon
Search documents
层层负责莫成层层卸责(纵横)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-06-15 21:51
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of excessive task delegation and the resulting burden on grassroots levels, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to responsibilities and tasks [1][2]. Group 1: Task Delegation and Responsibilities - The phenomenon of "layered task delegation" leads to unnecessary burdens on grassroots workers, where multiple demands are placed instead of a clear, singular focus [1]. - The practice of increasing standards and tasks to demonstrate commitment can overwhelm grassroots levels, hindering effective work and development [2]. - It is essential to ensure that each level of responsibility is clearly defined and that tasks are manageable, respecting the actual conditions on the ground [2]. Group 2: Addressing Bureaucracy and Formalism - The article identifies "layered task delegation" as a manifestation of formalism and bureaucratic practices that can harm public interests and delay local development [2]. - There is a call for significant efforts to rectify the issue of excessive task delegation, emphasizing that responsibility should not be shifted downwards without consideration of actual capabilities [2]. - Leaders are encouraged to model accountability and responsibility, fostering a collaborative environment where each level supports the others in achieving goals [2].
学纪知纪明纪守纪丨纠治执行政策“一刀切”、层层加码
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of implementing the Central Committee's decisions and policies accurately and effectively, while avoiding one-size-fits-all approaches and excessive burdens on grassroots levels [3][4][5] - The need for a balance between overall planning and local adaptation is highlighted, suggesting that strategies should be tailored to local conditions while aligning with higher-level policies [4][5] - The discussion includes the necessity of addressing formalism and bureaucratic tendencies, particularly in the context of policy execution, to ensure that grassroots officials can focus on practical implementation [5][10] Group 2 - The article identifies common issues in policy execution, such as "one-size-fits-all" approaches and excessive layering of requirements, which can hinder effective implementation and increase the burden on local officials [7][10] - It outlines the detrimental effects of these issues, including damage to public trust, misinterpretation of policies, and a decrease in administrative efficiency [9][10] - The root causes of these problems are explored, including distorted performance views, risk avoidance, and a lack of governance capacity at the grassroots level [8][10] Group 3 - The article suggests that rectifying these issues requires a focus on three key areas: correcting ideological biases, breaking down institutional barriers, and enhancing supervision and accountability [11][12] - It emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to political supervision, ensuring that policies are executed without deviation and that local adaptations are made where necessary [17][19] - The need for continuous monitoring and feedback mechanisms is stressed to ensure that policies remain effective and responsive to local needs [18][20]
层层落实不是层层加码(干部状态新观察·为基层减负赋能)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-05-26 22:20
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to reduce the burden on grassroots officials by addressing issues of excessive task layering and misalignment of responsibilities, ultimately aiming to enhance their work efficiency and morale [2][3]. Group 1: Issues Faced by Grassroots Officials - Grassroots officials are experiencing increased workloads due to layered task requirements and imprecise assessment methods, which create confusion and hinder their ability to serve the public effectively [2][3]. - The phenomenon of "layered increases" is prevalent, where tasks are compounded at various administrative levels, leading to unnecessary burdens on local officials [3][4]. Group 2: Measures Taken to Alleviate Burdens - Qinghai Province's Xining City has implemented clear task lists to reduce the burden on grassroots officials, promoting flexible enforcement in urban management [2][4]. - The city has introduced specific management standards for different types of roads, aiming to minimize disruptions to local vendors while maintaining urban aesthetics [4][5]. Group 3: Communication and Feedback Mechanisms - Xining City has established internal communication channels to facilitate feedback from grassroots officials, allowing for timely corrections of misaligned enforcement practices [6]. - The city promotes a "721" work method, focusing on resolving 70% of issues through service, 20% through management, and only 10% through enforcement, to reduce unnecessary punitive measures [6][7]. Group 4: Educational Initiatives and Policy Framework - Continuous education on the central government's eight regulations has led to the development of a task list aimed at reducing formalism and ensuring compliance with administrative laws [7]. - The city is committed to transforming educational outcomes into tangible benefits for the public, ensuring that the results of these initiatives are felt by the community [7].
不能层层加码,要层层负责(金台潮声·作风建设系列谈⑧)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-05-19 22:01
Core Viewpoint - The recent issuance of the "Regulations on the Integrity of Rural Grassroots Cadres" emphasizes the prohibition of excessive and mechanical execution of policies, signaling a strong intent to address the issue of overburdening grassroots levels [1] Group 1 - The phenomenon of excessive task layering has been identified as a significant burden on grassroots cadres, leading to unrealistic expectations and pressures, such as requiring same-day feedback for tasks that should take a week [1] - The root causes of this excessive layering include performance anxiety among cadres, who seek to exceed reasonable policy goals, and a desire for safety margins, resulting in inflated expectations [1] - The detrimental effects of excessive layering include fatigue among grassroots cadres and counterproductive outcomes, as high standards are set without regard for actual capabilities [1] Group 2 - Effective implementation of tasks requires a focus on tangible results rather than mere formalities, advocating for a methodical approach that respects the realities faced by grassroots [2] - To curb excessive layering, establishing clear institutional constraints and responsibility lists is crucial, along with refining assessment mechanisms to incorporate genuine feedback from frontline workers [2] - The ongoing education on the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations aims to improve work styles and ensure that responsibilities are clearly defined and executed, fostering a collaborative environment for reform and development [2]