Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of balancing work with rest, reflection, and strategic thinking to enhance productivity and personal growth [4][27]. Group 1: Understanding Rest - The societal issue of "busy syndrome" is highlighted, where individuals fear taking breaks due to the pressure of competition [6][10]. - A study from Oxford University demonstrated that taking breaks can significantly improve work efficiency and accuracy, with the best results coming from those who allowed themselves to rest [9]. - The narrative of a writer illustrates the detrimental effects of overworking and the rejuvenating power of rest, leading to improved creativity and productivity [13]. Group 2: Reflecting on Work - The concept of "pseudo-diligence" is introduced, where individuals work hard without assessing their outcomes, leading to ineffective efforts [16]. - A case study of a designer shows that incorporating reflection into daily routines can lead to significant improvements in work quality and efficiency [18]. - The article suggests a simple method for reflection, inspired by a finance leader, which involves asking oneself about achievements, value, and areas for improvement [17]. Group 3: Strategic Thinking - The story of a millionaire who transformed his life through strategic thinking and opportunity recognition illustrates the power of thoughtful action over mere hard work [21]. - The article stresses that successful individuals, like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, allocate time for deep thinking to drive innovation and strategic direction [23][24]. - It concludes that the key to overcoming mediocrity lies in the ability to think critically and strategically, rather than just working hard [25][26].

Core Viewpoint - The discussion highlights the contrasting work cultures and efficiency perceptions between employees in different countries, particularly between Singapore and China, with a focus on work hours and productivity [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Work Hours and Efficiency - A Singaporean employee shared their experience of leaving work at 7 PM, which sparked a debate about efficiency compared to Chinese employees who often start late shifts at 7 PM [1][2]. - Chinese employees argue that the culture of overtime is not necessarily linked to efficiency but is a result of internal competition and work culture [2][3]. - Comments from international employees indicate that 7 PM is considered late in many countries, with most employees in the UK and the US typically finishing work earlier [3][4]. Group 2: Cultural Differences in Work Environment - Employees from the UK and the US expressed that working until 7 PM is seen as excessive, with many expecting to leave by 5 or 6 PM [3][4]. - A Singaporean employee pointed out that the contractual obligation to leave at 7 PM should be respected, emphasizing that the focus should not be on comparing efficiencies but on adhering to agreed work hours [3]. - The discussion also reflects on the perception of work-life balance and the need for mutual understanding among international teams regarding different work practices [4].