Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of prioritizing people's livelihoods and addressing their concerns with a sense of responsibility and proactive engagement [1][2] - There is a notable issue where some party members are neglecting the needs of the public, leading to unresolved grievances and a deterioration of the relationship between the party and the people [1][2] - The article highlights the need for a shift in mindset among party members, urging them to view their roles as platforms for serving the public rather than for personal gain [2][3] Group 2 - It is essential to establish a robust responsibility and supervision mechanism to ensure that every issue raised by the public is addressed and managed effectively [3] - The evaluation system for party members should be improved to focus on public satisfaction and actual work results, rewarding those who excel in serving the community [3] - A supportive environment for innovation and accountability should be created, allowing party members to take initiative without fear of punitive measures for minor mistakes [3]