Core Insights - The article highlights the efforts of the Longhai District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision in addressing corruption and improving governance in rural construction projects and housing allocation [2][5][10] Group 1: Rural Construction Oversight - The Longhai District has implemented a comprehensive supervision mechanism for village-level engineering projects, ensuring transparency and accountability through a multi-step approval process involving local committees and government [2][4] - A specific case revealed discrepancies in a sewage treatment project, where the construction deviated from approved plans, leading to a 5% cost difference. The local authorities are now working to recover overpayments from the contractor [3][4] - Since the introduction of the "Two Managements and Five Controls" mechanism, the district has recovered 5.83 million yuan in economic losses related to rural projects, with a 22.2% decrease in complaints regarding construction projects [4] Group 2: Housing Allocation Issues - The district has identified and addressed issues related to the allocation of resettlement housing, including cases of multiple claims on single properties, which have caused significant public dissatisfaction [5][6] - Investigations revealed collusion between real estate company staff and intermediaries, leading to the illegal sale of resettlement houses. Several individuals involved have faced disciplinary actions and legal consequences [5][6] - A systematic review of 18 resettlement communities has been initiated to reclaim misappropriated properties and ensure proper registration for affected residents [5][6] Group 3: Strengthening Supervision Mechanisms - The district has developed a collaborative supervision system that integrates various levels of oversight to address issues arising from concentrated power among key personnel in public service [8][9] - The implementation of a tailored supervision checklist has improved accountability for officials in charge of public services, leading to disciplinary actions against several individuals for misconduct [8][9] - The district's efforts have resulted in the resolution of 2,406 public grievances related to corruption and inefficiency, enhancing the overall service quality of local governance [9][10]