Group 1 - The core issue of idle homestead land in rural areas is highlighted, with a significant idle rate potentially exceeding the reported 18.1% in 2019, leading to inefficient land use and resource misallocation [1][2] - The current legal framework restricts homestead land ownership to collective members, limiting market demand and hindering the realization of market value for idle land [2][3] - The proposal to activate idle homestead land through rental, equity participation, and cooperation faces challenges, including short-term lease agreements that do not provide stable rights for long-term investments [2][3] Group 2 - Existing homestead policies restrict the potential conversion of land for residential use, creating a mismatch between supply and demand for housing in rural areas [3][4] - Recommendations include promoting pilot reforms for homestead land, allowing for diverse activation methods based on local needs and characteristics [4][5] - The establishment of a unified national trading market for land use rights is suggested, enabling farmers to trade land use rights and allowing for the conversion of idle land back to agricultural use [5][6] Group 3 - The ongoing urbanization and rural revitalization efforts face challenges in the areas of population, land, and fiscal transfer payments, with a need for continued reforms in the household registration system [6][7] - It is essential to facilitate the transfer of construction land use rights across regions to support urbanization and resource reallocation [8] - The proposal emphasizes that fiscal transfer payments should follow population movements to ensure adequate public service provision in areas experiencing population influx [8]