【改进文风大家谈】 作者：郭洪雷（杭州师范大学人文学院教授） 在笔者看来，重温毛泽东同志的《反对党八股》，对破除当今文风之弊依旧具有深刻的启示意义。在这 篇文章里，毛泽东从当时革命工作的实际出发，历数形式主义文风的八大"罪状"，并有针对性地提出， 要用矛盾分析的方法去发现问题、分析问题、解决问题，破除不良文风对革命工作的消极影响。在文艺 创作上，赵树理积极践行这一方法，写出了《小二黑结婚》《李有才板话》《登记》《"锻炼锻炼"》 《三里湾》等优秀作品。赵树理把自己这些小说叫作"问题小说"。"为什么叫这个名字，就是因为我写 的小说，都是我下乡工作时在工作中所碰到的问题，感到那个问题不解决会妨碍我们工作的进展，应该 把它提出来。"这种以生活为创作源泉的立场和态度，对救治当今文风之弊不失为一剂良药。 《光明日报》（2026年01月11日 01版） [ 责编：袁晴 ] 一代有一代之文风，亦有一代之弊病。对文章写作中存在的弊端和习气，历代作者、学者多有总结和批 判。仅明清两代，就有汪琬的《文戒示门人》、李绂的《古文辞禁八条》、章学诚的《古文十弊》等致 力于此。及至近代，王葆心《古文辞通义》的"解蔽篇"，胪列为文之弊多达十 ...

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on improving writing style (文风) is fundamentally linked to improving work style (作风), highlighting the need for genuine content and practical solutions rather than mere formalism [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Writing Style - Writing style should not be limited to superficial changes in text or documents; it must reflect a deeper change in mindset and actions, driven by a transformation in work style [2]. - The essence of writing style issues stems from formalism in work style, where documents lack substance and fail to address real problems [1][2]. Group 2: Research and Engagement - Effective writing requires thorough investigation and understanding of grassroots realities, rather than relying on superficial or recycled content [2]. - Engaging with the community and understanding their needs is crucial for producing meaningful and impactful written work [2]. Group 3: Organizational Influence - The work environment significantly influences individual writing and work styles, necessitating a supportive political and operational ecosystem for effective change [2]. - Implementing regulations to reduce formalism and enhance genuine engagement with the community is essential for addressing issues like empty documents and inflated reports [2]. Group 4: Leadership and Accountability - Leaders must set an example by conducting research, writing authentically, and prioritizing practical results over mere rhetoric [3]. - There is a need to cultivate versatile leaders who can write, act, and communicate effectively, fostering a culture of accountability and practical engagement [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to improve writing style (文风) as a reflection of work style (作风), advocating for genuine content that addresses real issues rather than superficial writing [1][2] - Improving writing style should not be limited to merely changing words or documents; it requires a fundamental change in mindset and actions, driven by thorough research and understanding of grassroots realities [2][3] - The article highlights the importance of creating a conducive political and working environment to facilitate the transformation of work style and writing style, including implementing regulations to reduce formalism and enhance genuine engagement with the public [2][3] Group 2 - Party leaders and officials are encouraged to lead by example, engaging in more research and writing, and prioritizing practical results over mere rhetoric [3] - There is a call for cultivating a new generation of versatile officials who can write, act, and communicate effectively, fostering a culture of accountability and practical performance [3]