Group 1 - The article discusses the ambiguous distinction between "pornography" and "obscenity," highlighting the challenges in defining what constitutes artistic expression versus illegal dissemination [1][2][4] - It emphasizes that the historical context of Chinese literature has always included writings on desire, with texts like "The Art of the Bedroom" being viewed as educational rather than taboo [2][4] - The rise of "erotic novels" during the Ming and Qing dynasties reflects a tension between moral concerns and the depiction of societal norms, as seen in critiques of works like "Water Margin" and "Jin Ping Mei" [4][5] Group 2 - The legal framework in China began regulating pornography in the late 1980s, with laws categorizing "obscene publications" as criminal offenses, leading to a more structured control system [5][6] - The definition of "obscene materials" includes explicit depictions of sexual acts, but there is ongoing debate about what qualifies as "valuable literature or art," raising questions about who determines this value [6][9] - The case of "Faded City" illustrates the shifting perception of a work from being labeled as "obscene" to being recognized as a significant literary piece, showcasing the tension between societal morals and artistic expression [9][10] Group 3 - The article critiques the tendency to apply a singular evaluation standard to both serious literature and online literature, which often reflects different cultural contexts and audience engagement [11][13] - It discusses the genre of "danmei" literature as a space for female sexual fantasy, arguing that such works should not be held to the same societal value assessments as traditional literature [13][14] - The discourse surrounding "obscenity" is framed as subjective, suggesting that the definitions of "pornography" and "obscenity" require a nuanced understanding that involves multiple academic perspectives [14][15]