Workflow
执行难
icon
Search documents
小额罚金刑执行难如何破?检察机关探索大数据模型筛查线索
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-12 02:29
罪犯进入监狱服刑后,一些被法院判决罚金刑的罪犯却想尽办法藏匿财产、逃避交罚金,大量小额罚金 刑判决陷入"执行难"困境,刑事案件"最后一公里"的正义难以实现。 团河院是北京市检察院在监狱相对集中的大兴团河、天堂河地区设立的派出检察院,主要职责是对北京 市监狱等5所监管单位的监狱检察工作,包括刑罚执行和监管活动进行法律监督,维护在押人员合法权 益等。 罚金作为刑事判决中财产刑,是刑事执行过程中的"关键一环"。团河院在监狱检察监督工作中发现,所 辖部分监狱存在短刑犯缴纳罚金意愿低、罪犯遣送原籍后缴纳主动性差等问题,导致小额罚金刑难以执 行到位,影响执法司法公信力。 张剑介绍,在刑事案件中,公众关注的焦点往往是罪犯判了多少年,如果罚金刑金额比较小,罪犯履行 意愿不强,再加上罪犯进入诉讼程序后也可能存在转移财产的情况,很多的小额罚金刑就面临"执行 难"的现实情形。 据此,2024年2月起,团河院通过"罪犯小额罚金刑监督子模型",在所辖监狱开展小额罚金刑专项监 督。 张剑介绍,"罪犯小额罚金刑监督子模型"主要是将罪犯的"狱内账户余额""未履行财产刑数额"等数据进 行碰撞比对,并结合罪犯剩余刑期及处遇标准推算其预计消费支出 ...
对拒执行为携手亮剑(金台锐评)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-09 22:32
Core Viewpoint - The joint release of the "Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Refusing to Execute Judgments and Rulings" by the Supreme Court, Supreme Procuratorate, and Ministry of Public Security aims to strengthen the punishment for refusal to execute judgments, addressing the long-standing issue of "execution difficulties" and reinforcing the authority of the law [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The "Opinions" clarify the standards for applying criminal liability for refusal to execute judgments, evidence rules, and procedural connections, enhancing the punitive measures against such behaviors [1]. - There has been a historical tendency to prioritize civil execution over criminal accountability, leading to insufficient coordination among departments, which complicates evidence collection and case transfer [1][2]. - The new mechanism aims to provide better evidence collection support for creditors and to ease the burden of proof in self-reported cases of debtor crimes [2]. Group 2: Systematic Approach to Execution Challenges - Addressing execution difficulties requires a comprehensive approach that combines punishment with education, and short-term measures with long-term solutions [2]. - The establishment of a credit supervision system that imposes restrictions on dishonest executors is essential to ensure compliance with judicial rulings [2]. - A collaborative governance model involving various stakeholders, including the Party, the People's Congress, and the government, is necessary to uphold legal authority and promote social integrity [2]. Group 3: Technological Integration - The integration of technology is crucial in tackling execution challenges, with a focus on enhancing information systems for asset tracking and utilizing big data and AI for analyzing refusal to execute cases [3]. - The promotion of "smart execution" models aims to increase transparency and efficiency in the execution process, ensuring that judicial decisions are effectively enforced [3]. - The ultimate goal is to foster a societal culture where trust is valued and dishonesty is stigmatized, thereby reinforcing the principles of fairness and justice [3].
最高法答新京报:“立审执”一体化推动保全案件大幅增长
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-04-07 10:52
记者注意到,在当天最高法发布的首批执行实施专题指导性案例中,指导性案例254号明确,对于被保 全的款项,人民法院在作出生效裁判后、立案执行前,可以根据申请依法对该款项作出扣划裁定。由此 全额清偿的,人民法院可以向被保全人出具自动履行证明,避免给自动履行的债务人征信带来不利影 响。这种保全财产直接扣划的具体探索,正是人民法院内部"立审执"一体化协调配合的举措之一。 而以往,裁判生效后、立案执行前,即便债务人愿意主动将其被保全的财产用于偿还债务,通常也只能 采取两种措施:一是解除保全措施后再由债务人履行相应义务,二是由债权人向法院申请强制执行。但 是,前者存在转移财产、逃避履行的风险,后者会影响权利人利益的及时实现,也会造成债务人的信用 减损。 通过多链条联动,2024年执行案件出现拐点。周加海向新京报记者介绍了一组数据,以反映"立审执"一 体化协调机制成效。在全国法院案件数量仍然增长的情况下,申请执行案件下降6.3%;在执行案件数 量下降的情况下,执行完毕率40.13%,增长5.13个百分点,执行到位率54.29%,上升8.1个百分点;保 全案件同比增长30.8%,民事裁判自动履行率同比增长6.2个百分点;执行 ...