换位思考

Search documents
有一种高级的认知:看谁都是好人
洞见· 2025-07-05 11:04
洞见 ( DJ00123987 ) —— 不一样的观点,不一样的故事, 3000 万人订阅的微信大号。点击标题下 蓝字 " 洞见 " 关注,我们将为您提供有价值、有意思的延伸阅读。 你看到的坏人,都是你自己。 ♬ 点上方播放按钮可收听 洞见主播楚翘朗读音频 我有位朋友,在一家中德合资的公司上班。 当年他刚入职时,需要准备一批材料。 他反复检查了十多遍,确保材料没有问题后,才交给外方审批。 结果,外方反馈给他的交付清单上,每一列都打了大大的红叉。 你是否觉得对方的沟通方式太没有温度。 但如果你对德国的文化稍作了解,你会发现,其实在德国的文化背景下,打叉是对的意思。 作者:洞见·姜榆木 这是因为德国很早使用打字机,打叉能通过字母"x"轻易输入,而且相对于打勾,更不容易被 修改。 你看,只是换个角度看待别人,你就在避免误会的同时,也让自己的见识得到了提升。 万维钢曾说, 凡是能解释成善意的,不要解释为恶意。 排斥自己不能理解的事物,是人性的本能。 然而看谁都是好人,却是一种更高级的认知。 铁人王进喜曾在一家托儿所参观时,看到一个孩子在地上嚎啕大哭。 而不远处,一位阿姨正在一门心思安抚怀里的孩子。 王进喜严厉批评了那 ...
互联网时代:比信息茧房更可怕的是观念壁垒
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-19 03:07
Group 1 - The internet has the potential to expand knowledge but fails to enhance individual cognitive levels, leading to the formation of information cocoons that reinforce existing beliefs [3][4] - The current online environment is filled with opposing viewpoints, resulting in a breakdown of interpersonal relationships, as individuals struggle to understand each other's perspectives [4][5] - Many people are inclined to accept only those viewpoints that align with their own, which diminishes their ability to empathize and engage in constructive dialogue [6][10] Group 2 - High-traffic videos often reflect real societal issues, showcasing the existence of both irresponsible men and materialistic women, thus validating diverse perspectives [6][7] - The confusion between macro perspectives and micro interpersonal strategies leads individuals to misapply broad concepts to specific relationships, causing further misunderstandings [7][8] - Effective relationship management requires a balance of emotional understanding and rational analysis, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches to individual situations [8][9] Group 3 - Discussions around topics like bride price should be approached with mutual understanding and respect, rather than rigid expectations or societal pressures [9][10] - The internet should serve as a tool for broadening perspectives and enhancing cognitive abilities, rather than reinforcing biases and judgments [10]